Open Access Articles- Top Results for Boeing KC-46 Pegasus

Boeing KC-46 Pegasus

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.- #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. colspan="2" align="center" #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.300px </div> #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.- #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.colspan="2" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;text-align:center;" #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.The KC-46A will be externally similar to this Italian Air Force KC-767A refueling a B-52. #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-
KC-46 Pegasus

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Air-to-air tanker, strategic airlift #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-


#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Boeing #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-


#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. 2018 (planned) #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-


#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Under development #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

Primary user

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. United States Air Force #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-


#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. 2013–present #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

Unit cost #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.
US$189.4 million (FY13)[1]
US$250.2M (with R&D)[1]

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

Developed from

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Boeing KC-767 #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

The Boeing KC-46 Pegasus[2] is a military aerial refueling and strategic military transport aircraft developed by Boeing from its 767 jet airliner. In February 2011, the tanker was selected by the United States Air Force (USAF) as the winner in the KC-X tanker competition to replace older KC-135 Stratotankers. The first 18 combat-ready aircraft are to be delivered to the U.S. Air Force by August 2017 under the terms of the development contract.



Main article: Boeing KC-767

The U.S. Air Force ran a procurement program to replace around 100 of its oldest KC-135E Stratotankers, and selected Boeing's KC-767. The Boeing tanker received the KC-767A designation from the United States Department of Defense in 2002 and appearing in the 2004 edition of DoD model designation report.[3] The Air Force decided to lease 100 KC-767 tankers from Boeing.[4]

Despite several nations leasing military aircraft, there was criticism. US Senator John McCain and others criticized the draft leasing agreement as being wasteful and problematic. In response to the protests, the Air Force struck a compromise in November 2003, whereby it would purchase 80 KC-767 aircraft and lease 20 more.[5][6] In December 2003, the Pentagon announced the project was to be frozen when an investigation of allegations of corruption led to the jailing of one of its former procurement executives who applied to work for Boeing.[7] The Air Force's KC-767A contract was officially canceled by the DoD in January 2006.[8]

USAF KC-X Program

Main article: KC-X
File:BOEING KC767 McConnellAFB.JPG
An Italian Air Force KC-767 on the apron at McConnell AFB/Boeing Factory in Wichita, Kansas in 2010

In 2006 the USAF released a request for proposal (RFP) for a new tanker program, KC-X, to be selected by 2007. Boeing had also announced it may enter an even higher capability tanker based on the Boeing 777, named the KC-777 Strategic Tanker. Airbus partnered with Northrop Grumman to offer the Airbus A330 MRTT, the tanker version of the A330, which was being marketed to the USAF under the company name, KC-30.[9]

In late January 2007 the USAF issued the KC-X Aerial Refueling Aircraft Request for Proposal. The RFP called for 179 (4 system development and demonstration and 175 production) tankers, in a contract worth an estimated US$40 billion.[10] However, Northrop and EADS expressed their displeasure at how the RFP was structured and threatened to withdraw, leaving only Boeing to offer an aircraft.[11]

On 12 February 2007, Boeing announced it was offering the KC-767 Advanced Tanker for the KC-X Tanker competition.[12] Boeing stated that for KC-X's requirements, the KC-767 was a better fit than the KC-777.[13] On 11 April 2007, Boeing submitted its KC-767 tanker proposal to U.S. Air Force.[14] The KC-767 Advanced Tanker offered for this KC-X round was based on the in-development 767-200LRF (Long Range Freighter), rather than the -200ER on which Italian and Japanese KC-767 aircraft are based[15] differing by combining the -200ER fuselage, -300F wing, gear, cargo door and floor, -400ER digital flightdeck and flaps, uprated engines, and "sixth-generation" fly-by-wire fuel delivery boom.[16] The KC-767 uses manual flight control, allowing unrestricted maneuverability to avoid threats anywhere in the flight envelope.[17]

Boeing submitted the final version of its proposal on 3 January 2008.[18] On 29 February 2008, the DoD chose the Northrop Grumman/EADS KC-30, over the KC-767. The KC-30 was subsequently designated KC-45A by the Air Force.[19] Boeing submitted a protest to the United States Government Accountability Office on 11 March 2008 and began waging a public relations campaign in support of their protest.[20] On 18 June, following a series of admissions by the Air Force on the flaws in the bidding process, the GAO upheld Boeing's protest and recommended the contract be rebid.[20] On 9 July 2008, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced that the Air Force would reopen bidding on the tanker contract.[21] Secretary Gates put the contract for the KC-45 into an "expedited recompetition" with Defense Undersecretary John Young in charge of the selection process instead of the Air Force.[22] A draft of the revised RFP was provided to the contractors on 6 August 2008 for comments. By mid-August the revised RFP was to be finalized.[23] However, on 10 September 2008, the U.S. Defense Department canceled the KC-X solicitation.[24]

On 24 September 2009, the USAF began the first steps in the new round of bids, with a clearer set of criteria, including reducing the number of requirements from 800 to 373 in an attempt to simplify the process and allow a more objective decision to be made.[25] On 4 March 2010, Boeing announced it would bid the KC-767 tanker for the new KC-X round.[26] EADS announced in April 2010 it would submit a tanker bid without Northrop Grumman as a U.S. partner.[27][28] Boeing submitted its KC-767 "NewGen Tanker" bid on 9 July 2010.[29][30] The company submitted a revised bid on 10 February 2011.[31]

In addition to the KC-X, observers speculate that a modified KC-46 will be used as the basis of the KC-Y tanker program, the second step of the Air Force's three-step tanker renewal plan, as altering the KC-46 process and replacing it with something entirely new is likely too big of a risk.[32]

Selection and early development

On 24 February 2011, the Air Force announced the selection of Boeing's KC-767. The aircraft will receive the designation KC-46A.[33][34] Boeing was also awarded a development contract for the tanker. The contract calls for Boeing to complete and deliver 18 initial operational KC-46 tankers by 2017. The Air Force is seeking to receive a total of 179 new tankers.[35] Boeing's "NewGen Tanker" is based on the 767-200 with an improved version of the KC-10 refueling boom, and cockpit displays from the 787.[36][37]

In late June 2011, it was reported that development costs were projected to overrun by about $300 million. Boeing would be responsible for this amount, which exceeds the contract cost cap of $4.9 billion.[38][39] In July 2011, revised cost projections indicated a reduced cost overrun.[40] In March 2013, the program cost for development and procurement of 179 tankers was projected to total US$44.78 billion.[1]

In 2013, the USAF added additional crews and flight hours for the aircraft to their future plans in response to a review that showed that the best of current plans did not take full advantage of the KC-46's cargo and aeromedical evacuation advantages over the KC-135.[41]

On 21 August 2013, Boeing and the Air Force completed a critical design review (CDR) for the KC-46. The CDR was held from 8–10 July, and was completed one month ahead of the original schedule, which planned on the review to be finished on 24 September. With the CDR complete, the KC-46 design is now set and production and testing can proceed. Assembling of the wing for the first aircraft began on 26 June 2013. Flight testing of the Boeing 767-2C airframe, which will be reconfigured into the KC-46, was scheduled to begin in mid-2014. The first fully equipped KC-46 tanker is projected to fly in early 2015. Boeing is contracted to build four test aircraft and deliver 18 combat-ready tankers by August 2017. The Air Force is to buy 179 KC-46s, with all delivered by 2028.[42][43]

On 12 December 2013, Boeing joined the wings and fuselage for the first 767-2C to be adapted into a KC-46A.[44] On 23 December 2013, the first two PW4062 engines were delivered.[45] The first of four 767-2C provision freighters will complete assembly by the end of January 2014. Once assembled, it will go through ground vibration and instrumentation testing and have body fuel tanks added. The first test flight will occur during summer 2014 and include measuring its rate of climb and descent. The Engineering Manufacturing and Design (EMD) model will be integrated with instrumentation, electronics, and technologies needed to become a military-standard KC-46A by January 2015. Seven low-rate production KC-46s are to be delivered in 2015, 12 in 2016, and 15 delivered annually from 2017 to 2027. The KC-46A can carry 212,000 lb of fuel, 10 percent more than the KC-135, and Script error: No such module "convert". of cargo. It has both a probe and drogue and a boom and receptacle to conduct multiple refueling missions on a single mission. Survivability is improved with infrared countermeasures and the aircraft has limited electronic warfare capabilities.[46] The airframe can be configured to carry 114 passengers and to serve as an aero-medical evacuation aircraft. The last of four test aircraft began assembly on 16 January 2014.[47]

In April 2014, the Government Accountability Office found that the KC-46 program was projected to underrun its projected cost estimate of $51.7 billion by $300 million. The program acquisition unit cost per jet will also be $287 million, $1.8 million less than estimated. The GAO noted that delays in training aircrew and maintainers could cause testing to slip 6–12 months, but also stated that the program had not missed any major milestones and that the development of about 15.8 million lines of software code was progressing as planned.[48] In May 2014, the Air Force estimated the cost of the development program, including the first four aircraft, could rise from $4.4–4.9 billion to $5.85 billion.[49]

In July 2014, Boeing recorded a $272 million pre-tax charge to cover a redesign of the tanker's wiring.[50][51] The wiring issue arose when it was found that 5-10% of the wiring bundles did not have sufficient separation distance or were not properly shielded to meet an Air Force requirement for double or triple-redundant wiring for some mission systems. In September 2014, it was confirmed that the wiring redesign would delay the first 767-2C flight from June 2014 to November 2014.[52][53] The 767-2C's first flight took place on 28 December 2014; it flew from Paine Field and landed at Boeing Field.[54][55]

Operational history

On 23 April 2014, the USAF announced that the KC-46 Pegasus will be based at McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kansas. The base will start receiving the first of 36 tankers in 2016. The KC-135 Stratotanker is currently stationed at this base.[56][57] McConnell AFB was chosen because it had low construction costs and it is in a location with a high demand for air refueling. Up to 10 operating bases are to be chosen for the KC-46 fleet. Pegasus crews will be trained at Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma. Altus AFB was also chosen for its limited construction needs and for other training programs for the C-17 Globemaster and KC-135 already at the base.[58]

On 14 April 2015, the USAF announced that Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; Seymour-Johnson AFB, North Carolina; Westover Air Reserve Base, Massachusetts; and Grissom ARB, Indiana are candidate bases for the first Air Force Reserve-led KC-46A Pegasus location. The KC-46As will begin arriving at the first Air Force Reserve-led Global Mobility Wing in fiscal year 2019. The Air Mobility Command and Air Force Reserve Command will conduct detailed, on-the-ground site surveys of each candidate base. Once the site surveys are completed, the results will be briefed to the SecAF and chief of staff of the Air Force to select preferred and reasonable alternatives for the operating location. The Air Force plans to announce the Reserve-led KC-46A preferred and reasonable alternatives and begin the Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) in the summer of 2015.[59]


In June 2014, Boeing submitted the KC-46 for the Republic of Korea Air Force's requirement for four aerial tankers. Boeing pitched that it could support all of the country's main current and future combat aircraft, would seamlessly integrate with the USAF, and that the Boeing 767 it is based on has a 99 percent readiness rate. The KC-46 can operate from smaller airfields, which is an advantage over the competing Airbus KC-30. Deliveries could begin in 2018.[60]

Boeing is pitching the KC-46 to the Polish Air Force for their tanker requirement. Although Poland is part of the European Defence Agency, which has a requirement for eight tankers, Poland wants to operate up to four tanker aircraft to ensure its air force is not constrained by any decision made by the EDA. International delivery slots can be available by 2018. The KC-46 faces competition from the Airbus A330 MRTT and the Israel Aerospace Industries tanker conversion of the Boeing 767 airliner. A decision is expected by the end of 2014.[61]


23x15px United States


Data from USAF KC-46A,[63] Boeing KC-767,[64] Boeing 767-200ER[65]

General characteristics
  • Crew: 3 (2 pilots, 1 boom operator) basic crew; 15 permanent seats for additional/optional air crew members, including aeromedical evacuation crew members
  • Capacity: seating for up to 114 people, 18 463L pallets, or 58 patients (24 litters, 34 ambulatory)
  • Payload: 65,000 lb (29,500 kg)
  • Length: 165 ft 6 in (50.5 m)
  • Wingspan: 157 ft 8 in (48.1 m)
  • Height: 52 ft 1 in (15.9 m)
  • Empty weight: 181,610 lb (82,377 kg)
  • Max. takeoff weight: 415,000 lb (188,240 kg)
  • Powerplant: 2 × Pratt & Whitney PW4062 turbofan, 63,300 lbf[64] (282 kN) each
  • Fuel Capacity: 212,299 lb (96,297 kg)
    Maximum Transfer Fuel Load: 207,672 lb (94,198 kg)


See also

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Portal/images/u' not found.

Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 "Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs" (PDF). Defense Acquisitions. US Government Accountability Office. March 2013. pp. 91–2. GAO-13-294SP. Retrieved 26 May 2013. 
  2. "KC-46A tanker gets new name: Pegasus". The Air Force Times. 2014-07-21. Retrieved 2014-07-26. 
  3. Model Designation of Military Aerospace Vehicles (PDF), US: DoD, 12 May 2004, DoD 4120.15L .
  4. Tirpak, John A. "100 Tankers". Air Force magazine, August 2003.
  5. "Tanker Twilight Zone", Air Force magazine 87 (2), February 2004 .
  6. Pope, Charles. "Pentagon finalizes Boeing tanker deal". Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7 November 2003.
  7. Cahlink, George, "Ex-Pentagon procurement executive gets jail time". Government Executive, October 1, 2004.
  8. Majumdar, Dave. "Boeing wins KC-X tanker battle". AirForceTimes, 24 February 2011.
  9. Northrop Grumman KC-30 marketing web site[dead link]
  10. Air Force Posts KC-X Request for Proposals. USAF, 2007-01-30.
  11. Evens, Ben and Daly, Matthew (AP), "Northrop-EADS threatens to withdraw bid for US Air Force contract leaving only Boeing". Aerotech News and Review, 2 February 2007.
  12. Borak, D. "Boeing Unveils Air Force Tanker in $40 Billion Contract Competition". Associated Press. 12 February 2007.
  13. "Why the 767?". Air Force magazine, 13 February 2007.
  14. "Boeing Submits KC-767 Advanced Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force". Boeing, 11 April 2007.
  15. "Boeing Offers KC-767 Advanced Tanker to U.S. Air Force". Boeing, 12 February 2007.
  16. "Size matters in US Air Force KC-X contest". Flight International, 21 January 2008.
  17. "Boeing to Offer NewGen Tanker to US Air Force"., 5 March 2010.
  18. "Boeing Submits Final KC-767 Advanced Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force". Boeing, 3 January 2008.
  19. Butler, Amy, Fulghum, Davis A and Wall, Robert. "Northrop/EADS Clinches U.S. Refueler Deal"[dead link]. Aviation Week, 29 February 2008.
  20. 20.0 20.1 "GAO backs Boeing tanker protest". King 5 News. 18 June 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2008. [dead link]
  21. "Air Force to Reopen Bidding on Tanker Contract". New York Times, 10 July 2008.
  22. Kruzel, John J. "Pentagon Reopens Bidding on Tanker Contract". US DoD, 9 July 2008.
  23. "Pentagon Issues New Tanker Bid Parameters"[dead link]. Aviation Week, 6 August 2008.
  24. "DoD Announces Termination of KC-X Tanker Solicitation". US DoD, 10 September 2008.
  25. Air Force Resumes Tanker Contest
  26. "Boeing to Offer NewGen Tanker to US Air Force". Boeing, 4 March 2010.
  27. "EADS Re-Enters Tanker Bidding". Wall Street Journal, 21 April 2010.
  28. Butler, Amy. "Northrop Grumman Officially Out of KC-X"[dead link]. Aviation Week, 9 March 2010.
  29. Trimble, Stephen. "USAF receives three proposals for KC-X, but Antonov team admits concerns". Flight International, 9 July 2010.
  30. "Boeing Submits NewGen Tanker Proposal to US Air Force". Boeing, 9 July 2010.
  31. Gates, Dominic. "Boeing, EADS Submit Final Bids For Air Force Tanker Contract". Seattle Times, 11 February 2011.
  32. What's Next: USAF Lays Groundwork To Replace Fighter, Tanker Fleets -, 14 September 2014
  33. "USAF selects Boeing for KC-X contract", Flight global, 2011-02-24 .
  34. "Boeing Wins $35B Air Force Tanker Deal". Bloomberg, 24 February 2011.
  35. Boeing Receives US Air Force Contract to Build Next-Generation Refueling Tanker (press release), Boeing, 24 February 2011 .
  36. Warwick, Graham. "Boeing Wins Restaged U.S. Air Force KC-X Tanker"[dead link]. Aviation Week, 25 February 2011.
  37. Trimble, Stephen (29 September 2010), "Boeing source reveals specifications for KC-767 NewGen Tanker", Flight International (Flight global) .
  38. Cappacio, Tony. "Boeing projected to face $300 million overrun on tanker contract". The Seattle Times. NW source. 
  39. Butler, Amy (29 June 2011). "Boeing Liable For KC-46 Overage". Aviation Week. Retrieved 29 July 2011. 
  40. Weisgerber, Marcus. "Boeing Lowers KC-46 Cost Estimate". Defense News, 27 July 2011.
  41. "Air Force increases projected KC-46 flying hours, crew ratio", Global security, 2013-02-05 .
  42. USAF and Boeing complete KC-46 critical design review, Flight global, 4 September 2013 .
  43. "US Air Force, Boeing Finalize KC-46A Tanker Aircraft Design." Boeing news release, 4 September 2013
  44. "Boeing Joins First KC-46A Airframe", Aviation week, 12 December 2013 .
  45. First PW4062 engines for KC-46 tanker delivered -, 23 December 2013
  46. First KC-46A Baseline Test Aircraft Due This Month -, 12 January 2014
  47. Boeing assembles final KC-46A test aircraft -, 16 January 2014
  48. "KC-46 on the Money", Air force mag, 11 April 2014 
  49. Cameron, Doug, "Boeing takes hit for tanker troubles". Wall Street Journal, 24 July 2014, p. B2.
  50. "Boeing Reports Second-Quarter Results and Raises 2014 EPS Guidance". Boeing, 23 July 2014.
  51. "Boeing reports KC-46A loss, rejects wider concerns"., 23 July 2014.
  52. Everstine, Brian (16 September 2014). "First Flight for KC-46 Tanker Platform Slips Further". Aviation Week (Penton). Retrieved 12 September 2014. 
  53. Everstine, Brian (16 September 2014). "First flight delayed for KC-46A test aircraft". (Gannett). Retrieved 16 September 2014. 
  54. Norris, Guy (29 December 2014). "Boeing 767-2C First Flight Begins Tanker Test Campaign". Aviation Week. Retrieved 2 January 2015. 
  55. Daryl Mayer (28 December 2014). "Boeing completes successful first flight in KC-46 program". 88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs. Retrieved 14 January 2015. 
  56. "USAF: McConnell to house next generation tankers". KWCH, 22 April 2014.
  57. "McConnell gets final OK for refueling tankers, prepares to spend $219 million for construction". The Wichita Eagle, 22 April 2014.
  58. "Altus selected for KC-46A training"., 23 April 2014.
  59. "AF announces KC-46A candidate bases"., 14 April 2015.
  60. "Boeing offers KC-46 for South Korea tanker requirement"., 30 June 2014.
  61. Boeing eyes Poland as first KC-46A export buyer -, 3 September 2014
  62. 62.0 62.1 62.2 "McConnell, Pease and Altus chosen to host KC-46A tanker". Air Force Times. 2013-05-22. Retrieved 2014-07-26. 
  63. KC-46A Tanker Factsheet. U.S. Air Force, 18 May 2011.
  64. 64.0 64.1 64.2 KC-767 Advanced Tanker product card (archive copy), KC-767 International Tanker backgrounder. Boeing.
  65. 767-200ER specifications. Boeing.

External links