Adverts

Open Access Articles- Top Results for Boeing XB-55

Boeing XB-55

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-
XB-55
Role

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Strategic bomber #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

Manufacturer

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Boeing #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-




Status

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. Cancelled #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

Primary user

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. United States Air Force #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-

Number built

#REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect. 0 #REDIRECTmw:Help:Magic words#Other
This page is a soft redirect.-



Boeing XB-55 (company designation Model 474) was a proposed Boeing aircraft designed to be a strategic bomber. The XB-55 was intended to be a replacement for the Boeing B-47 Stratojet in United States Air Force (USAF) service.

Design and development

The XB-55 concept was contained in a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the United States Air Force in October 1947, two months before the first flight of the XB-47 prototype. Several United States manufacturers responded to the RFP. Boeing was selected from among this group and given a contract on 1 July 1948 to conduct further engineering studies. Boeing's initial approach was to mount four turboprop engines on an airframe similar to its B-47: the wing would have less sweepback; the Allison T40-A-2 engines would drive three-blade contra-rotating propellers, i.e., six blades per engine; the engines were to be mounted in nacelles hung from the wings, two per side; the landing gear was to be similar to the B-47's tandem gear with outriggers retracting into the outboard engine nacelles. The XB-55 had a projected top speed of Script error: No such module "convert". and a cruising speed of Script error: No such module "convert"., with a maximum weight of Script error: No such module "convert"., a wingspan of Script error: No such module "convert"., and length of Script error: No such module "convert"..[1]

There was a major disagreement between the engine manufacturer and the propeller manufacturer over whether the Allison T40-A-2 driveshaft was strong enough to take the forces caused at high revolutions per minute of the propellers. Allison was predicting that it would be at least four years before a successful powerplant would be delivered. In October 1948, a conference in Dayton, Ohio was addressing the problems of the XB-55 when it was proposed over lunch that the XB-52 (Boeing Model 464), which until that point had been planned with turboprop engines, could be equipped with the forthcoming Pratt & Whitney J57 turbojet engines. Within a week, it was clear that not only would the XB-52 outperform the XB-55, it could be flying at least a year before the XB-55 could be expected to have reliable engines. Also bearing on the decision to abandon the XB-55 program were government funding constraints and the growing realization that the B-47 was becoming more successful than first projected. On 29 January 1949, the Air Materiel Command was directed to cancel the Boeing XB-55 contract.

Under a revised contract, the Boeing Project 474 was converted into the Boeing Project 479, which included a study of using six J40 turbojet engines in place of the turboprops on a similar wing platform, but with a thicker root section. Work on detailed engineering and mockup construction was canceled, although Boeing was contracted to continue conceptual studies and wind tunnel investigations. These studies proved valuable in development of the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, which first flew on April 15, 1952.

The XB-55 project did not result in construction of a prototype.

Specifications (Estimated)

Data from Air Force Museum Fact Sheet[2]

General characteristics
  • Crew: ten
  • Length: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Wingspan: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Height: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Gross weight: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Max takeoff weight: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Powerplant: 4 × Allison T40A-2 coupled turboprop engines, Script error: No such module "convert". each

Performance

  • Maximum speed: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Cruise speed: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Range: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Service ceiling: Script error: No such module "convert".</ul>Armament
  • Guns: 10× 20 mm (.79 in) cannons
  • Bombs: 24,000 lb (10,900 kg) bombs
 </ul>

See also

Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era

Related lists

References

Notes
Bibliography
  • Bowers, Peter M. Boeing Aircraft Since 1916. London: Putnam, 1989. ISBN 0-85177-804-6.
  • Butler, Tony (2010). American Secret Projects. Hinckley, England: Midland Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85780-331-0.
  • Jones, Lloyd S. U.S. Bombers, B-1 1928 to B-1 1980s. Fallbrook, CA: Aero Publishers, 1962, second edition 1974. ISBN 0-8168-9126-5.
</dl>