Open Access Articles- Top Results for Corporate farming

Corporate farming

File:Broiler house.jpg
The US poultry industry is often used as an example of corporate farming due to the influence of large integrators like Tyson Foods and Perdue Farms.

Corporate farming is a term used to describe companies that own or influence farms and agricultural practices on a large scale. This includes not only corporate ownership of farms and selling of agricultural products, but also the roles of these companies in influencing agricultural education, research, and public policy through funding initiatives and lobbying efforts.

The definition and effects of corporate farming on agriculture are widely debated, though most sources that describe large businesses in agriculture as "corporate farms" portray their role in a negative light.[1]

Definitions and Usage

The varied and fluid meanings of "corporate farming" have resulted in conflicting definitions of the term, with implications in particular for legal definitions.

Legal definitions

Most legal definitions of corporate farming in the United States pertain to tax laws,[2] anti-corporate farming laws,[3] and census data collection.[4] These definitions mostly reference farm income, indicating farms over a certain threshold as corporate farms, as well as ownership of the farm, specifically targeting farms that do not pass ownership through family lines.

Common definitions

In public discourse, the term "corporate farming" lacks a firmly established definition and is variously applied. However, several features of the term's usage frequently arise:

  1. It is largely used as a pejorative with strong negative connotations.[1]
  2. It most commonly refers to corporations that are large-scale farms, market agricultural technologies (in particular pesticides, fertilizers, and GMO's), have significant economic and political influence, or some combination of the three.[5][6]
  3. It is usually used in opposition to family farms[7] and new agricultural movements, such as sustainable agriculture and the local food movement.[8]

Family Farms

File:Santa Gertrudis.jpg
The Nunley Brothers Ranch in Sabinal, Texas has been family owned and operated for over 70 years.[9] The ranch is also among the largest private landowners in the US.[10]

"Family farm" and "corporate farm" are often defined as mutually exclusive terms, with the two having fundamentally opposing goals.[11] This mostly stems from the widespread assumption that family farms are small farms while corporate farms are large scale operations. While it is true that the majority of small farms are family owned, many large farms are also family businesses, including some of the largest farms in the US.[12]

Additionally, there are large economic and legal incentives for family farmers to incorporate their businesses.[13]

Contract Farming

Farming contracts are agreements between a farmer and a buyer that stipulates what the farmer will grow and how much they will grow usually in return for guaranteed purchase of the product or financial support in purchase of inputs (e.g. feed for livestock growers).[14] In most instances of contract farming, the farm is family owned while the buyer is a larger corporation.[15] This makes it difficult to distinguish the contract farmers from "corporate farms," because they are family farms but with significant corporate influence. This subtle distinction left a loop-hole in many state laws that prohibited corporate farming, effectively allowing corporations to farm in these states as long as they contracted with local farm owners.[16]

Non-farm Entities

File:Cargill Beef Australia in Bomen.jpg
Cargill beef processing plant in Australia.

Many people also choose to include non-farming entities in their definitions of corporate farming. Beyond just the farm contractors mentioned above, these types of companies commonly considered part of the term include Cargill, Monsanto, and DuPont Pioneer among others. These corporations do not have production farms, meaning they do not produce a significant amount of farm products. However, their role in producing and selling agricultural supplies and their purchase and processing of farm products often leads to them being grouped with corporate farms. While this is technically incorrect, many find including these companies in the term "corporate farming" useful in order to describe the influence of large companies over agriculture.

United States statistics on corporate and family farms

The 2012 US Census of Agriculture indicates that 5.06 percent of US farms are corporate farms. These include family corporations (4.51 percent) and non-family corporations (0.55 percent). Of the family farm corporations, 98 percent are small corporations, with 10 or fewer stockholders. Of the non-family farm corporations, 90 percent are small corporations, with 10 or fewer stockholders. Non-family corporate farms account for 1.36 percent of US farmland area. Family farms (including family corporate farms) account for 96.7 percent of US farms and 89 percent of US farmland area.[17] Other farmland in the US is accounted for by several other categories, including single proprietorships where the owner is not the farm operator, non-family partnerships, estates, trusts, cooperatives, collectives, institutional, research, experimental and American Indian Reservation farms.

In the US, the average size of a non-family corporate farm is 1078 acres, i.e. smaller than the average family corporate farm (1249 acres) and smaller than the average partnership farm (1131 acres).[17]

Anti-Corporate Farming Laws

To date, nine US states have enacted laws that restrict or prohibit corporate farming. The first of these laws were enacted in the 1930s by Kansas and North Dakota respectively. In the 1970s, similar laws were passed in Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, South Dakota and Wisconsin.[18] In 1982, after failure to pass an anti-corporate farming law, the citizens of Nebraska enacted by initiative a similar amendment into their state constitution.[19] The citizens of South Dakota similarly amended their state constitution in 1998.[18]

All nine laws have similar content. They all restrict corporate ability to own and operate on farmland. They all outline exceptions for specific types of corporations. However, they vary significantly in how they define a corporate farm, and in the specific restrictions. Definitions of a farm can include any and all farm operations, or be dependent on the source of income, as in Iowa, where 60 percent of income must come from farm products.[18] Additionally, these laws can target a corporation's use of the land, meaning that companies can own but not farm the land, or they may outright prohibit corporations from buying and owning farmland.[20] The precise wording of these laws has significant impact on how corporations can participate in agriculture in these states with the ultimate goal of protecting and empowering the family farm.[21]

See also


  1. ^ a b Rumble, Joy N. (March 2014). "The Power of Words: Exploring Consumers’ Perceptions of Words Commonly Associated with Agriculture" (PDF). Journal of Applied Communications. Retrieved 26 October 2014. 
  2. ^ "Farm, Farming and Who’s a Farmer for Tax Purposes" (PDF). Rural Tax Education. August 2010. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  3. ^ Welsh, Rick (October 2001). "On the Effectiveness of state anti-corporate farming laws in the United States". Food Policy. doi:10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00020-3. Retrieved 26 October 2014. 
  4. ^ "Farm Household Well-being: Glossary". USDA Economic Research Service. 26 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2014. 
  5. ^ Wittmaack, Nathan (July 2006). "Should Corporate Farming be Limited in the United States? An Economic Perspective" (PDF). Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  6. ^ Persaud, Suresh (16 April 2008). "Impact of Agribusiness Market Power on Farmers". doi:10.1002/9780470390375.ch7. 
  7. ^ "Corporate Concentration in Agriulture". Farm Aid. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  8. ^ Martinez, Steve (May 2010). "Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues" (PDF). USDA Economic Research Service. Retrieved 26 October 2014. 
  9. ^ "Nunley Brothers Ranches: About". Retrieved 6 November 2014. 
  10. ^ Zeveloff, Julie (23 October 2012). "The 25 Biggest Landholders in America". Business Insider. Retrieved 6 November 2014. 
  11. ^ Stout, Jan (1996). "The Missouri Anti-Corporate Farming Act: Reconciling the Interests of the Independent Farmer and the Corporate Farm". Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  12. ^ "Ag 101: Demographics". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  13. ^ Patsche, Wanda (20 October 2014). "Family Farms vs. Farm Corporations". Minnesota Farm Living. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  14. ^ "Contract Farming Resource Centre: FAQ". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2014. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  15. ^ Warning, Matthew (30 June 2000). "The Impact of Contract Farming on Income Distribution: Theory and Evidence" (PDF). Western Economics Association International Annual Meetings. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  16. ^ "Anti-Corporate Farming Laws in the Heartland". Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  17. ^ a b United States Department of Agriculture. 2014. 2012 Census of agriculture. United States summary and state data. Volume 1. Geographic area series. Part 51 AC-12-A-51.
  18. ^ a b c "Anti-Corporate Farming Laws". Encyclopedia of the Great Plains. Retrieved 27 October 2014. 
  19. ^ "Initiative 300: Nebraska's Anti-corporate Farming Law". Center for Rural Affairs. Retrieved 6 November 2014. 
  20. ^ "Corporate Farming Laws". National Agricultural Law Center. Retrieved 6 November 2014. 
  21. ^ "Corporate Farming (Restrictions on Corporate Farming/Family Farm Preservation)". National Agricultural Law Center. Retrieved 6 November 2014.