Frequent Links
Dynamical system
A dynamical system is a concept in mathematics where a fixed rule describes how a point in a geometrical space depends on time. Examples include the mathematical models that describe the swinging of a clock pendulum, the flow of water in a pipe, and the number of fish each springtime in a lake.
At any given time a dynamical system has a state given by a set of real numbers (a vector) that can be represented by a point in an appropriate state space (a geometrical manifold). Small changes in the state of the system create small changes in the numbers. The evolution rule of the dynamical system is a fixed rule that describes what future states follow from the current state. The rule is deterministic; in other words, for a given time interval only one future state follows from the current state.^{[1]}^{[2]}
Contents
Overview
The concept of a dynamical system has its origins in Newtonian mechanics. There, as in other natural sciences and engineering disciplines, the evolution rule of dynamical systems is an implicit relation that gives the state of the system for only a short time into the future. (The relation is either a differential equation, difference equation or other time scale.) To determine the state for all future times requires iterating the relation many times—each advancing time a small step. The iteration procedure is referred to as solving the system or integrating the system. If the system can be solved, given an initial point it is possible to determine all its future positions, a collection of points known as a trajectory or orbit.
Before the advent of computers, finding an orbit required sophisticated mathematical techniques and could be accomplished only for a small class of dynamical systems. Numerical methods implemented on electronic computing machines have simplified the task of determining the orbits of a dynamical system.
For simple dynamical systems, knowing the trajectory is often sufficient, but most dynamical systems are too complicated to be understood in terms of individual trajectories. The difficulties arise because:
 The systems studied may only be known approximately—the parameters of the system may not be known precisely or terms may be missing from the equations. The approximations used bring into question the validity or relevance of numerical solutions. To address these questions several notions of stability have been introduced in the study of dynamical systems, such as Lyapunov stability or structural stability. The stability of the dynamical system implies that there is a class of models or initial conditions for which the trajectories would be equivalent. The operation for comparing orbits to establish their equivalence changes with the different notions of stability.
 The type of trajectory may be more important than one particular trajectory. Some trajectories may be periodic, whereas others may wander through many different states of the system. Applications often require enumerating these classes or maintaining the system within one class. Classifying all possible trajectories has led to the qualitative study of dynamical systems, that is, properties that do not change under coordinate changes. Linear dynamical systems and systems that have two numbers describing a state are examples of dynamical systems where the possible classes of orbits are understood.
 The behavior of trajectories as a function of a parameter may be what is needed for an application. As a parameter is varied, the dynamical systems may have bifurcation points where the qualitative behavior of the dynamical system changes. For example, it may go from having only periodic motions to apparently erratic behavior, as in the transition to turbulence of a fluid.
 The trajectories of the system may appear erratic, as if random. In these cases it may be necessary to compute averages using one very long trajectory or many different trajectories. The averages are well defined for ergodic systems and a more detailed understanding has been worked out for hyperbolic systems. Understanding the probabilistic aspects of dynamical systems has helped establish the foundations of statistical mechanics and of chaos.
History
Many people regard Henri Poincaré as the founder of dynamical systems.^{[3]} Poincaré published two now classical monographs, "New Methods of Celestial Mechanics" (1892–1899) and "Lectures on Celestial Mechanics" (1905–1910). In them, he successfully applied the results of their research to the problem of the motion of three bodies and studied in detail the behavior of solutions (frequency, stability, asymptotic, and so on). These papers included the Poincaré recurrence theorem, which states that certain systems will, after a sufficiently long but finite time, return to a state very close to the initial state.
Aleksandr Lyapunov developed many important approximation methods. His methods, which he developed in 1899, make it possible to define the stability of sets of ordinary differential equations. He created the modern theory of the stability of a dynamic system.
In 1913, George David Birkhoff proved Poincaré's "Last Geometric Theorem," a special case of the threebody problem, a result that made him world famous. In 1927, he published his Dynamical SystemsBirkhoff's most durable result has been his 1931 discovery of what is now called the ergodic theorem. Combining insights from physics on the ergodic hypothesis with measure theory, this theorem solved, at least in principle, a fundamental problem of statistical mechanics. The ergodic theorem has also had repercussions for dynamics.
Stephen Smale made significant advances as well. His first contribution is the Smale horseshoe that jumpstarted significant research in dynamical systems. He also outlined a research program carried out by many others.
Oleksandr Mykolaiovych Sharkovsky developed Sharkovsky's Theorem on the periods of discrete dynamical systems in 1964. One of the implications of the theorem is that if a discrete dynamical system on the real line has a periodic point of period 3, then it must have periodic points of every other period.
Basic definitions
A dynamical system is a manifold M called the phase (or state) space endowed with a family of smooth evolution functions Φ^{t} that for any element of t ∈ T, the time, map a point of the phase space back into the phase space. The notion of smoothness changes with applications and the type of manifold. There are several choices for the set T. When T is taken to be the reals, the dynamical system is called a flow; and if T is restricted to the nonnegative reals, then the dynamical system is a semiflow. When T is taken to be the integers, it is a cascade or a map; and the restriction to the nonnegative integers is a semicascade.
Examples
The evolution function Φ^{ t} is often the solution of a differential equation of motion
 <math> \dot{x} = v(x). \, </math>
The equation gives the time derivative, represented by the dot, of a trajectory x(t) on the phase space starting at some point x_{0}. The vector field v(x) is a smooth function that at every point of the phase space M provides the velocity vector of the dynamical system at that point. (These vectors are not vectors in the phase space M, but in the tangent space T_{x}M of the point x.) Given a smooth Φ^{ t}, an autonomous vector field can be derived from it.
There is no need for higher order derivatives in the equation, nor for time dependence in v(x) because these can be eliminated by considering systems of higher dimensions. Other types of differential equations can be used to define the evolution rule:
 <math> G(x, \dot{x}) = 0 \, </math>
is an example of an equation that arises from the modeling of mechanical systems with complicated constraints.
The differential equations determining the evolution function Φ^{ t} are often ordinary differential equations: in this case the phase space M is a finite dimensional manifold. Many of the concepts in dynamical systems can be extended to infinitedimensional manifolds—those that are locally Banach spaces—in which case the differential equations are partial differential equations. In the late 20th century the dynamical system perspective to partial differential equations started gaining popularity.
Further examples
 Logistic map
 Complex quadratic polynomial
 Dyadic transformation
 Tent map
 Double pendulum
 Arnold's cat map
 Horseshoe map
 Baker's map is an example of a chaotic piecewise linear map
 Billiards and outer billiards
 Hénon map
 Lorenz system
 Circle map
 Rössler map
 KaplanYorke map
 List of chaotic maps
 Swinging Atwood's machine
 Quadratic map simulation system
 Bouncing ball dynamics
Linear dynamical systems
Linear dynamical systems can be solved in terms of simple functions and the behavior of all orbits classified. In a linear system the phase space is the Ndimensional Euclidean space, so any point in phase space can be represented by a vector with N numbers. The analysis of linear systems is possible because they satisfy a superposition principle: if u(t) and w(t) satisfy the differential equation for the vector field (but not necessarily the initial condition), then so will u(t) + w(t).
Flows
For a flow, the vector field Φ(x) is an affine function of the position in the phase space, that is,
 <math> \dot{x} = \phi(x) = A x + b,\,</math>
with A a matrix, b a vector of numbers and x the position vector. The solution to this system can be found by using the superposition principle (linearity). The case b ≠ 0 with A = 0 is just a straight line in the direction of b:
 <math>\Phi^t(x_1) = x_1 + b t. \, </math>
When b is zero and A ≠ 0 the origin is an equilibrium (or singular) point of the flow, that is, if x_{0} = 0, then the orbit remains there. For other initial conditions, the equation of motion is given by the exponential of a matrix: for an initial point x_{0},
 <math>\Phi^t(x_0) = e^{t A} x_0. \,</math>
When b = 0, the eigenvalues of A determine the structure of the phase space. From the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors of A it is possible to determine if an initial point will converge or diverge to the equilibrium point at the origin.
The distance between two different initial conditions in the case A ≠ 0 will change exponentially in most cases, either converging exponentially fast towards a point, or diverging exponentially fast. Linear systems display sensitive dependence on initial conditions in the case of divergence. For nonlinear systems this is one of the (necessary but not sufficient) conditions for chaotic behavior.
Maps
A discretetime, affine dynamical system has the form of a matrix difference equation:
 <math> x_{n+1} = A x_n + b, \, </math>
with A a matrix and b a vector. As in the continuous case, the change of coordinates x → x + (1 − A)^{ –1}b removes the term b from the equation. In the new coordinate system, the origin is a fixed point of the map and the solutions are of the linear system A^{ n}x_{0}. The solutions for the map are no longer curves, but points that hop in the phase space. The orbits are organized in curves, or fibers, which are collections of points that map into themselves under the action of the map.
As in the continuous case, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A determine the structure of phase space. For example, if u_{1} is an eigenvector of A, with a real eigenvalue smaller than one, then the straight lines given by the points along α u_{1}, with α ∈ R, is an invariant curve of the map. Points in this straight line run into the fixed point.
There are also many other discrete dynamical systems.
Local dynamics
The qualitative properties of dynamical systems do not change under a smooth change of coordinates (this is sometimes taken as a definition of qualitative): a singular point of the vector field (a point where v(x) = 0) will remain a singular point under smooth transformations; a periodic orbit is a loop in phase space and smooth deformations of the phase space cannot alter it being a loop. It is in the neighborhood of singular points and periodic orbits that the structure of a phase space of a dynamical system can be well understood. In the qualitative study of dynamical systems, the approach is to show that there is a change of coordinates (usually unspecified, but computable) that makes the dynamical system as simple as possible.
Rectification
A flow in most small patches of the phase space can be made very simple. If y is a point where the vector field v(y) ≠ 0, then there is a change of coordinates for a region around y where the vector field becomes a series of parallel vectors of the same magnitude. This is known as the rectification theorem.
The rectification theorem says that away from singular points the dynamics of a point in a small patch is a straight line. The patch can sometimes be enlarged by stitching several patches together, and when this works out in the whole phase space M the dynamical system is integrable. In most cases the patch cannot be extended to the entire phase space. There may be singular points in the vector field (where v(x) = 0); or the patches may become smaller and smaller as some point is approached. The more subtle reason is a global constraint, where the trajectory starts out in a patch, and after visiting a series of other patches comes back to the original one. If the next time the orbit loops around phase space in a different way, then it is impossible to rectify the vector field in the whole series of patches.
Near periodic orbits
In general, in the neighborhood of a periodic orbit the rectification theorem cannot be used. Poincaré developed an approach that transforms the analysis near a periodic orbit to the analysis of a map. Pick a point x_{0} in the orbit γ and consider the points in phase space in that neighborhood that are perpendicular to v(x_{0}). These points are a Poincaré section S(γ, x_{0}), of the orbit. The flow now defines a map, the Poincaré map F : S → S, for points starting in S and returning to S. Not all these points will take the same amount of time to come back, but the times will be close to the time it takes x_{0}.
The intersection of the periodic orbit with the Poincaré section is a fixed point of the Poincaré map F. By a translation, the point can be assumed to be at x = 0. The Taylor series of the map is F(x) = J · x + O(x^{2}), so a change of coordinates h can only be expected to simplify F to its linear part
 <math> h^{1} \circ F \circ h(x) = J \cdot x.\, </math>
This is known as the conjugation equation. Finding conditions for this equation to hold has been one of the major tasks of research in dynamical systems. Poincaré first approached it assuming all functions to be analytic and in the process discovered the nonresonant condition. If λ_{1}, ..., λ_{ν} are the eigenvalues of J they will be resonant if one eigenvalue is an integer linear combination of two or more of the others. As terms of the form λ_{i} – ∑ (multiples of other eigenvalues) occurs in the denominator of the terms for the function h, the nonresonant condition is also known as the small divisor problem.
Conjugation results
The results on the existence of a solution to the conjugation equation depend on the eigenvalues of J and the degree of smoothness required from h. As J does not need to have any special symmetries, its eigenvalues will typically be complex numbers. When the eigenvalues of J are not in the unit circle, the dynamics near the fixed point x_{0} of F is called hyperbolic and when the eigenvalues are on the unit circle and complex, the dynamics is called elliptic.
In the hyperbolic case, the Hartman–Grobman theorem gives the conditions for the existence of a continuous function that maps the neighborhood of the fixed point of the map to the linear map J · x. The hyperbolic case is also structurally stable. Small changes in the vector field will only produce small changes in the Poincaré map and these small changes will reflect in small changes in the position of the eigenvalues of J in the complex plane, implying that the map is still hyperbolic.
The Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser (KAM) theorem gives the behavior near an elliptic point.
Bifurcation theory
When the evolution map Φ^{t} (or the vector field it is derived from) depends on a parameter μ, the structure of the phase space will also depend on this parameter. Small changes may produce no qualitative changes in the phase space until a special value μ_{0} is reached. At this point the phase space changes qualitatively and the dynamical system is said to have gone through a bifurcation.
Bifurcation theory considers a structure in phase space (typically a fixed point, a periodic orbit, or an invariant torus) and studies its behavior as a function of the parameter μ. At the bifurcation point the structure may change its stability, split into new structures, or merge with other structures. By using Taylor series approximations of the maps and an understanding of the differences that may be eliminated by a change of coordinates, it is possible to catalog the bifurcations of dynamical systems.
The bifurcations of a hyperbolic fixed point x_{0} of a system family F_{μ} can be characterized by the eigenvalues of the first derivative of the system DF_{μ}(x_{0}) computed at the bifurcation point. For a map, the bifurcation will occur when there are eigenvalues of DF_{μ} on the unit circle. For a flow, it will occur when there are eigenvalues on the imaginary axis. For more information, see the main article on Bifurcation theory.
Some bifurcations can lead to very complicated structures in phase space. For example, the Ruelle–Takens scenario describes how a periodic orbit bifurcates into a torus and the torus into a strange attractor. In another example, Feigenbaum perioddoubling describes how a stable periodic orbit goes through a series of perioddoubling bifurcations.
Ergodic systems
In many dynamical systems, it is possible to choose the coordinates of the system so that the volume (really a νdimensional volume) in phase space is invariant. This happens for mechanical systems derived from Newton's laws as long as the coordinates are the position and the momentum and the volume is measured in units of (position) × (momentum). The flow takes points of a subset A into the points Φ^{ t}(A) and invariance of the phase space means that
 <math> \mathrm{vol} (A) = \mathrm{vol} ( \Phi^t(A) ). \, </math>
In the Hamiltonian formalism, given a coordinate it is possible to derive the appropriate (generalized) momentum such that the associated volume is preserved by the flow. The volume is said to be computed by the Liouville measure.
In a Hamiltonian system, not all possible configurations of position and momentum can be reached from an initial condition. Because of energy conservation, only the states with the same energy as the initial condition are accessible. The states with the same energy form an energy shell Ω, a submanifold of the phase space. The volume of the energy shell, computed using the Liouville measure, is preserved under evolution.
For systems where the volume is preserved by the flow, Poincaré discovered the recurrence theorem: Assume the phase space has a finite Liouville volume and let F be a phase space volumepreserving map and A a subset of the phase space. Then almost every point of A returns to A infinitely often. The Poincaré recurrence theorem was used by Zermelo to object to Boltzmann's derivation of the increase in entropy in a dynamical system of colliding atoms.
One of the questions raised by Boltzmann's work was the possible equality between time averages and space averages, what he called the ergodic hypothesis. The hypothesis states that the length of time a typical trajectory spends in a region A is vol(A)/vol(Ω).
The ergodic hypothesis turned out not to be the essential property needed for the development of statistical mechanics and a series of other ergodiclike properties were introduced to capture the relevant aspects of physical systems. Koopman approached the study of ergodic systems by the use of functional analysis. An observable a is a function that to each point of the phase space associates a number (say instantaneous pressure, or average height). The value of an observable can be computed at another time by using the evolution function φ^{ t}. This introduces an operator U^{ t}, the transfer operator,
 <math> (U^t a)(x) = a(\Phi^{t}(x)). \, </math>
By studying the spectral properties of the linear operator U it becomes possible to classify the ergodic properties of Φ^{ t}. In using the Koopman approach of considering the action of the flow on an observable function, the finitedimensional nonlinear problem involving Φ^{ t} gets mapped into an infinitedimensional linear problem involving U.
The Liouville measure restricted to the energy surface Ω is the basis for the averages computed in equilibrium statistical mechanics. An average in time along a trajectory is equivalent to an average in space computed with the Boltzmann factor exp(−βH). This idea has been generalized by Sinai, Bowen, and Ruelle (SRB) to a larger class of dynamical systems that includes dissipative systems. SRB measures replace the Boltzmann factor and they are defined on attractors of chaotic systems.
Nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos
Simple nonlinear dynamical systems and even piecewise linear systems can exhibit a completely unpredictable behavior, which might seem to be random, despite the fact that they are fundamentally deterministic. This seemingly unpredictable behavior has been called chaos. Hyperbolic systems are precisely defined dynamical systems that exhibit the properties ascribed to chaotic systems. In hyperbolic systems the tangent space perpendicular to a trajectory can be well separated into two parts: one with the points that converge towards the orbit (the stable manifold) and another of the points that diverge from the orbit (the unstable manifold).
This branch of mathematics deals with the longterm qualitative behavior of dynamical systems. Here, the focus is not on finding precise solutions to the equations defining the dynamical system (which is often hopeless), but rather to answer questions like "Will the system settle down to a steady state in the long term, and if so, what are the possible attractors?" or "Does the longterm behavior of the system depend on its initial condition?"
Note that the chaotic behavior of complex systems is not the issue. Meteorology has been known for years to involve complex—even chaotic—behavior. Chaos theory has been so surprising because chaos can be found within almost trivial systems. The logistic map is only a seconddegree polynomial; the horseshoe map is piecewise linear.
Geometrical definition
A dynamical system is the tuple <math> \langle \mathcal{M}, f , \mathcal{T}\rangle </math>, with <math>\mathcal{M}</math> a manifold (locally a Banach space or Euclidean space), <math>\mathcal{T}</math> the domain for time (nonnegative reals, the integers, ...) and f an evolution rule t → f^{ t} (with <math>t\in\mathcal{T}</math>) such that f^{ t} is a diffeomorphism of the manifold to itself. So, f is a mapping of the timedomain <math> \mathcal{T}</math> into the space of diffeomorphisms of the manifold to itself. In other terms, f(t) is a diffeomorphism, for every time t in the domain <math> \mathcal{T}</math> .
Measure theoretical definition
A dynamical system may be defined formally, as a measurepreserving transformation of a sigmaalgebra, the quadruplet (X, Σ, μ, τ). Here, X is a set, and Σ is a sigmaalgebra on X, so that the pair (X, Σ) is a measurable space. μ is a finite measure on the sigmaalgebra, so that the triplet (X, Σ, μ) is a probability space. A map τ: X → X is said to be Σmeasurable if and only if, for every σ ∈ Σ, one has <math>\tau^{1}\sigma \in \Sigma</math>. A map τ is said to preserve the measure if and only if, for every σ ∈ Σ, one has <math>\mu(\tau^{1}\sigma ) = \mu(\sigma)</math>. Combining the above, a map τ is said to be a measurepreserving transformation of X , if it is a map from X to itself, it is Σmeasurable, and is measurepreserving. The quadruple (X, Σ, μ, τ), for such a τ, is then defined to be a dynamical system.
The map τ embodies the time evolution of the dynamical system. Thus, for discrete dynamical systems the iterates <math>\tau^n=\tau \circ \tau \circ \cdots\circ\tau</math> for integer n are studied. For continuous dynamical systems, the map τ is understood to be a finite time evolution map and the construction is more complicated.
Examples of dynamical systems
 Arnold's cat map
 Baker's map is an example of a chaotic piecewise linear map
 Circle map
 Double pendulum
 Billiards and Outer billiards
 Hénon map
 Horseshoe map
 Irrational rotation
 List of chaotic maps
 Logistic map
 Lorenz system
 Rossler map
Multidimensional generalization
Dynamical systems are defined over a single independent variable, usually thought of as time. A more general class of systems are defined over multiple independent variables and are therefore called multidimensional systems. Such systems are useful for modeling, for example, image processing.
See also
References
 ^ Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology and chemistry. Perseus publishing.
 ^ Katok, A., & Hasselblatt, B. (1995). Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. Cambridge, Cambridge.
 ^ Holmes, Philip. "Poincaré, celestial mechanics, dynamicalsystems theory and “chaos”." Physics Reports 193.3 (1990): 137163.
Further reading
Works providing a broad coverage:
 Ralph Abraham and Jerrold E. Marsden (1978). Foundations of mechanics. Benjamin–Cummings. ISBN 080530102X. (available as a reprint: ISBN 0201408406)
 Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences (ISSN 09380396) has a subseries on dynamical systems with reviews of current research.
 Christian Bonatti, Lorenzo J. Díaz, Marcelo Viana (2005). Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity: A Global Geometric and Probabilistic Perspective. Springer. ISBN 3540220666.
 Stephen Smale (1967). "Differentiable dynamical systems". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 73 (6): 747–817. doi:10.1090/S000299041967117981.
Introductory texts with a unique perspective:
 V. I. Arnold (1982). Mathematical methods of classical mechanics. SpringerVerlag. ISBN 0387968903.
 Jacob Palis and Wellington de Melo (1982). Geometric theory of dynamical systems: an introduction. SpringerVerlag. ISBN 0387906681.
 David Ruelle (1989). Elements of Differentiable Dynamics and Bifurcation Theory. Academic Press. ISBN 0126017107.
 Tim Bedford, Michael Keane and Caroline Series, eds. (1991). Ergodic theory, symbolic dynamics and hyperbolic spaces. Oxford University Press. ISBN 019853390X.
 Ralph H. Abraham and Christopher D. Shaw (1992). Dynamics—the geometry of behavior, 2nd edition. AddisonWesley. ISBN 0201567164.
Textbooks
 Kathleen T. Alligood, Tim D. Sauer and James A. Yorke (2000). Chaos. An introduction to dynamical systems. Springer Verlag. ISBN 0387946772.
 Oded Galor (2011). <span />Discrete Dynamical Systems<span />. Springer. ISBN 9783642071850.
 Anatole Katok and Boris Hasselblatt (1996). Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. Cambridge. ISBN 0521575575.
 Guenter Ludyk (1985). Stability of Timevariant DiscreteTime Systems. Springer. ISBN 3528089113.
 Stephen Lynch (2010). Dynamical Systems with Applications using Maple 2nd Ed. Springer. ISBN 0817643893.
 Stephen Lynch (2007). Dynamical Systems with Applications using Mathematica. Springer. ISBN 0817644822.
 Stephen Lynch (2004). Dynamical Systems with Applications using MATLAB. Springer. ISBN 0817643214.
 James Meiss (2007). Differential Dynamical Systems. SIAM. ISBN 0898716357.
 Morris W. Hirsch, Stephen Smale and Robert Devaney (2003). Differential Equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos. Academic Press. ISBN 0123497035.
 Julien Clinton Sprott (2003). <span />Chaos and timeseries analysis<span />. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198508395.
 Steven H. Strogatz (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology chemistry and engineering. Addison Wesley. ISBN 0201543443.
 Teschl, Gerald (2012). Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 9780821883280.
 Stephen Wiggins (2003). Introduction to Applied Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer. ISBN 0387001778.
Popularizations:
 Florin Diacu and Philip Holmes (1996). Celestial Encounters. Princeton. ISBN 0691027439.
 James Gleick (1988). Chaos: Making a New Science. Penguin. ISBN 0140092501.
 Ivar Ekeland (1990). Mathematics and the Unexpected (Paperback). University Of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226199908.
 Ian Stewart (1997). Does God Play Dice? The New Mathematics of Chaos. Penguin. ISBN 0140256024.
External links
 Interactive applet for the Standard and Henon Maps by A. Luhn
 A collection of dynamic and nonlinear system models and demo applets (in Monash University's Virtual Lab)
 Arxiv preprint server has daily submissions of (nonrefereed) manuscripts in dynamical systems.
 DSWeb provides uptodate information on dynamical systems and its applications.
 Encyclopedia of dynamical systems A part of Scholarpedia — peer reviewed and written by invited experts.
 Nonlinear Dynamics. Models of bifurcation and chaos by Elmer G. Wiens
 Oliver Knill has a series of examples of dynamical systems with explanations and interactive controls.
 Sci.Nonlinear FAQ 2.0 (Sept 2003) provides definitions, explanations and resources related to nonlinear science
Online books or lecture notes:
 Geometrical theory of dynamical systems. Nils Berglund's lecture notes for a course at ETH at the advanced undergraduate level.
 Dynamical systems. George D. Birkhoff's 1927 book already takes a modern approach to dynamical systems.
 Chaos: classical and quantum. An introduction to dynamical systems from the periodic orbit point of view.
 Modeling Dynamic Systems. An introduction to the development of mathematical models of dynamic systems.
 Learning Dynamical Systems. Tutorial on learning dynamical systems.
 Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Lecture notes by Gerald Teschl
Research groups:
 Dynamical Systems Group Groningen, IWI, University of Groningen.
 Chaos @ UMD. Concentrates on the applications of dynamical systems.
 Dynamical Systems, SUNY Stony Brook. Lists of conferences, researchers, and some open problems.
 Center for Dynamics and Geometry, Penn State.
 Control and Dynamical Systems, Caltech.
 Laboratory of Nonlinear Systems, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL).
 Center for Dynamical Systems, University of Bremen
 Systems Analysis, Modelling and Prediction Group, University of Oxford
 NonLinear Dynamics Group, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon
 Dynamical Systems, IMPA, Instituto Nacional de Matemática Pura e Applicada.
 Nonlinear Dynamics Workgroup, Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences.
Simulation software based on Dynamical Systems approach:
