Global labor arbitrage
|The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (January 2013)|
Global labor arbitrage is an economic phenomenon where, as a result of the removal of or disintegration of barriers to international trade, jobs move to nations where labor and the cost of doing business (such as environmental regulations) is inexpensive and/or impoverished labor moves to nations with higher paying jobs.
Two common barriers to international trade are tariffs (politically imposed) and the costs of transporting goods across oceans. With the advent of the Internet, the decrease of the costs of telecommunications, and the possibility of near-instantaneous document transfer, the barriers to the trade of intellectual work product, which is essentially, any kind of work that can be performed on a computer (such as computer programming) or that makes use of a college education, have been greatly reduced.
Often, a prosperous nation (such as the United States) will remove its barriers to international trade, integrating its labor market with those of nations with a lower cost of labor (such as India, China, and Mexico), resulting in a shifting of jobs from the prosperous nation to the developing one. The end result is an increase in the supply of labor relative to the demand for labor, which means a decrease in costs.
Forms of global labor arbitrage
Global labor arbitrage can take many forms, including but not limited to:
Capital moves to nations with cheap labor, lower taxes and or fewer environmental regulations or other costs of doing business for the purpose of producing goods and services for export to other markets. The classic example is the case of a factory or office closing in Nation A and then moving to Nation B for the purpose of producing goods or services at lower labor costs for export back to Nation A's market. This can result in layoffs for workers in Nation A. For example, in the United States, the amount of manufacturing jobs has decreased while the importation of manufactured goods from other nations has increased (along with the United States' trade deficit). These trends are now affecting the service sector as well.
Importation of foreign labor using work visas
Labor, often skilled and educated, moves to a nation on a temporary or permanent basis. This has the effect of increasing the supply of labor in that nation's market.
This type of labor importation may be advantageous. According to the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA), over 25% of all startups responding to an NVCA survey, in the San Francisco Bay Area of the US in the last 15 years were "immigrant-founded" (most likely former or current H-1Bs). 40% of all publicly traded and venture founded companies in high tech manufacturing were started by immigrants. These account for more than half of all jobs in this sector.
The same study shows that the following immigrant founded companies employ more than 200,000 people:
- Intel (co-founders: Gordon Moore-US, Robert Noyce-US)
- Sun Microsystems (1982-2010) (co-founders: Vinod Khosla-India, Andy Bechtolsheim-Germany, Bill Joy-US, Scott McNealy-US)
- Google (co-founders: Larry Page-US, Sergey Brin-Russia)
- Yahoo! (co-founders: David Filo-US, Jerry Yan-Taiwan)
- eBay (founder: Pierre Omidyar-France)
Previous studies authored by Stuart Anderson, of the National Foundation for American Policy,  had been careful to make the distinction of, "...founded or co-founded..." whereas the National Venture Capital Association uses the term, "immigrant-founded" 55 times in its 39 page document. The publication's data tables disclose only the names of "immigrant-born founder or cofounder", American born co-founders, and the number of American co-founders, are omitted. Additionally, according to Intel Corporation (99,900 employees), CEO Andy Grove was not an Intel co-founder.
Impoverished labor moves towards capital in prosperous nations. This tends to increase the supply of labor relative to capital in the prosperous nations and potentially decreases wages, according to the laws of supply and demand (of and for labor). However, this decrease can be offset by job creation due to talented immigrants, as discussed in the last section.
Although only peripherally related to the issue of global labor arbitrage but very much related to the issue of the economic prosperity and well being of non-immigrants, mass immigration can result in a population explosion which can negatively affect the well being of native people. Logically, after a nation's population has reached a certain size relative to its amount of useful land, an increasing population results in crowding (higher real estate costs and less open-space per person), a greater strain on the environment (increased environmental degradation), and increasing costs of living (fewer natural resources available per capita). Consequently, when considered in that context, it might be possible to also regard immigration as a form of "environmental arbitrage" where people flow from areas of high population density to areas of lower population density.
- Paul Craig Roberts (07/28/04)."Global Labor Arbitrage". VDARE.
- The "global labor arbitrage" phenomenon has been described by economist Stephen S. Roach. See Mike Whitney, "Labor arbitrage," Entrepreneur, June 2006.
- Nadeem, S (2009) "The Uses and Abuses of Time: Globalization and Time Arbitrage in India’s Outsourcing Industries," Global Networks.
- Anderson, Stuart; Michaela Platzer. "American Made: The Impact of Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Professionals on U.S. Competitiveness" (PDF). National Venture Capital Association. Retrieved 22 July 2012.
- "About". Biographies. National Foundation for American Policy. Retrieved 1 March 2014.
- "Intel Facts". Answers to our most frequent questions. Intel. Retrieved 1 March 2014.
- Second Thoughts on Free Trade by Senator Charles Schumer and Paul Craig Roberts
- Debunking the Myth of a Desperate Software Labor Shortage
- No Jobs for the New Economy or the Old
- Subprime Nation by Patrick J. Buchanan makes mention of how trade deficit dollars are being used to purchase American-owned assets.