Open Access Articles- Top Results for Hundred Years%27 War

Hundred Years' War

Hundred Years' War
Hundred Years' War
Clockwise, from top left: John of Bohemia at the Battle of Crécy,
English and Franco-Castilian fleets at the Battle of La Rochelle,
Henry V and the English army at the Battle of Agincourt,
Joan of Arc rallies French forces at the Siege of Orléans
Date1337–1453 (116 years)
LocationFrance, the Low Countries, England, Spain

Edwardian War (1337–1360):
English victory: Treaty of Brétigny
Caroline War (1369–1389):
French victory: Treaty of Bruges
Lancastrian War, first phase (1415–1428):
English victory: Treaty of Troyes

Lancastrian War, 2nd phase (1429–1453):
French victory:
House of Valois retains the throne of France
England gains the Pale of Calais but loses all other continental territory
15px Kingdom of France
15px Kingdom of Castile
15px Duchy of Brittany (Blois)
15px Kingdom of Scotland
15px Republic of Genoa
15px Kingdom of Bohemia
15px Kingdom of Aragon
15px Kingdom of England
15px Duchy of Burgundy
15px Duchy of Brittany (Montfort)
15px Kingdom of Portugal
15px Kingdom of Navarre
15px County of Flanders
15px County of Hainaut
15px Duchy of Aquitaine
Casualties and losses
High High

The Hundred Years' War was a series of conflicts waged from 1337 to 1453 between the House of Plantagenet, rulers of the Kingdom of England, against the House of Valois, rulers of the Kingdom of France, for control of the latter kingdom. Each side drew many allies into the war. It was the most notable conflict of the Middle Ages, wherein five generations of kings from two rival dynasties fought for the throne of the largest kingdom in Western Europe. The war saw both the height of chivalry and its subsequent decline, and the development of strong national identities in both countries.

For their French possessions, the English kings since the Norman Conquest were vassals of the kings of France. The French kings had endeavored, over the centuries, to reduce the possessions of their over-mighty vassals, to the effect that only Gascony was left to the English. The confiscation or threat of confiscating this duchy had been part of French policy to check the growth of English power, particularly whenever the English were at war with the Kingdom of Scotland, an ally of France.

Through his mother, Isabella of France, Edward III was the grandson of Philip IV of France, and nephew of Charles IV of France, the last king of the senior line of the House of Capet. In 1316, a principle was established denying women succession to the French throne. When Charles IV died in 1328, Isabella, unable to claim the French throne for herself, claimed it for her son. The French rejected the claim, maintaining that Isabella could not transmit a right which she did not possess. For about nine years (1328-1337), the English had accepted the Valois succession to the French throne. But the interference of the French king, Philip VI, in Edward III's war against Scotland, led Edward III to reassert his claim to the French throne. Several overwhelming English victories in the war—especially at Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt—raised the prospects of an ultimate English triumph. However, the greater resources of the French monarchy precluded a complete conquest. Starting in 1429, decisive French victories at Patay, Formigny, and Castillon concluded the war in favor of France, with England permanently losing most of its major possessions on the continent.

Historians commonly divide the war into three phases separated by truces: the Edwardian Era War (1337–1360); the Caroline War (1369–1389); and the Lancastrian War (1415–1453). Contemporary conflicts in neighbouring areas, which were directly related to this conflict, included the War of the Breton Succession (1341–1364), the Castilian Civil War (1366–1369), the War of the Two Peters (1356–1375) in Aragon, and the 1383–85 Crisis in Portugal. Later historians invented the term "Hundred Years' War" as a periodization to encompass all of these events, thus constructing the longest military conflict in history.

The war owes its historical significance to multiple factors. By its end, feudal armies had been largely replaced by professional troops, and aristocratic dominance had yielded to a democratisation of the manpower and weapons of armies. Although primarily a dynastic conflict, the war gave impetus to ideas of French and English nationalism. The wider introduction of weapons and tactics supplanted the feudal armies where heavy cavalry had dominated. The first standing armies in Western Europe since the time of the Western Roman Empire originated during the war, composed largely of commoners and thus helping to change their role in warfare. With respect to the belligerents, English political forces over time came to oppose the costly venture. The dissatisfaction of English nobles, resulting from the loss of their continental landholdings, became a factor leading to the civil wars known as the Wars of the Roses (1455–1487). In France, civil wars, deadly epidemics, famines, and bandit free-companies of mercenaries reduced the population drastically. Shorn of its Continental possessions, England was left with the sense of being an island nation, which profoundly affected its outlook and development for more than 500 years.[1]

Origin of the conflict

The root causes of the conflict can be found in the demographic, economic and social crises of 14th century Europe. The outbreak of war is motivated by a gradual rise in tension between the Kings of France and England about Guyenne, Flanders and Scotland. The dynastic question, which arose due to an interruption of the direct male line of the Capetians, is the official pretext.

Dynastic turmoil in France: 1314–28

The question of female succession to the French throne was raised after the death of Louis X in 1316. Louis X left only a daughter, and his posthumous son lived only a few days. Philip, Count of Poitiers, brother of Louis X, asserted that "women cannot succeed to the French throne". Through his political sagacity he won over his adversaries, and succeeded to the French throne as Philip V of France. By the same law that he procured, his daughters were denied the succession, which passed to his younger brother, Charles IV, in 1322.[2]

Philip III
15px King of France
r. 1270–1285
Philip IV
15px King of France
15px King of Navarre
r. 1285–1314
Charles of Valois
d. 1325
Louis X
15px King of France
15px King of Navarre
r. 1314–16
Philip V
15px King of France
15px King of Navarre
r. 1316–22
Charles IV
15px King of France
15px King of Navarre
r. 1322–28
IsabellaEdward II
15px King of England
Philip VI
15px King of France
r. 1328–50
Joan II
15px Queen of Navarre
b. 1312
Joan III of Burgundy
b. 1308
Edward III
15px King of England
b. 1312
Charles of Évreux
b. 1332
Philip of Burgundy
b. 1323

Charles IV died in 1328, leaving a daughter and a pregnant wife. If the unborn child is male, he is king; if not, Charles left the choice of his successor to the nobles.

By proximity of blood, the nearest male relative of Charles IV was his nephew Edward III of England. Edward was the son of Isabella, the sister of the dead French king, but the question arose whether she should be able to transmit a right that she did not herself possess because of her gender. The French nobility, moreover, balked at the prospect of being ruled by the English king. The assemblies of the French barons and prelates and the University of Paris decided that males who derive their right to inheritance through their mother should be excluded. Thus the nearest heir through male ancestry was Charles IV's first cousin, Philip, Count of Valois, and it was decided that he should be crowned Philip VI. In 1340 the Avignon papacy confirmed that under Salic law males should not be able to inherit through their mothers.[2][3]

Eventually, Edward III reluctantly recognized Philip VI and paid him homage for his French fiefs. He made concessions in Guyenne, but reserved the right to reclaim territories arbitrarily confiscated. After that, he expected to be left undisturbed while he made war on Scotland.

The dispute over Guyenne: a problem of sovereignty

Further information: Peerage of France
File:Hommage of Edward I to Philippe le Bel.jpg
Homage of Edward I of England (kneeling) to Philip IV of France (seated), 1286. As Duke of Aquitaine, Edward was also a vassal to the French King.

The Anglo-Norman dynasty that had ruled England since the Norman conquest of 1066 was brought to an end when the son of Geoffrey of Anjou and Empress Matilda, Henry (great-grandson of William the Conqueror), became the first of the Angevin Kings of England in 1154 as King Henry II.[4] The King of England, in what is now known as the Angevin Empire, directly ruled more territory on the continent than the King of France. However, as holders of continental duchies, English kings owed homage to the King of France. From the 11th century onward, the dukes had autonomy, neutralising the issue.[5]

John of England inherited the Angevin domains from King Richard I. However, Philip II of France acted decisively to exploit the weaknesses of King John, both legally and militarily, and by 1204 had succeeded in taking control of most of the Angevin continental possessions. Following John's reign, the Battle of Bouvines (1214), the Saintonge War (1242), and finally the War of Saint-Sardos (1324) resulted in the complete loss of Normandy and the reduction of England's holdings on the continent to a few provinces in Gascony.[6]

The dispute over Guyenne is even more important than the dynastic question in explaining the outbreak of the war. Guyenne posed a significant problem to the kings of France and England: Edward III is a vassal of Philip VI of France and must recognize the sovereignty of the King of France on Guyenne. In practical terms, a judgment in Guyenne may be subject to an appeal to the court of Paris and not in London. The King of France has the power to revoke all legal decisions made by the King of England in Aquitaine, which is of course totally unacceptable to the English. Therefore, sovereignty over Guyenne is a latent conflict between the two monarchies for several generations.

During the War of Saint-Sardos, Charles of Valois, father of Philip VI, invaded Aquitaine in behalf of Charles IV and conquered the duchy after a local insurrection, which the French believed had been incited by Edward II of England. Charles IV grudgingly accepted to return this territory in 1325. To recover his duchy, Edward II must compromise: he sends his son, the future Edward III, to pay homage. The King of France agreed to restore Guyenne, minus Agen. But the French delayed the return of the lands, which gave Philip VI a leverage. On 6 June 1329, Edward III finally paid homage to the King of France. However, at the ceremony, Philip VI had it recorded that the homage was not due to the fiefs detached from the duchy of Guyenne by Charles IV (especially Agen). For Edward, the homage did not imply the renunciation of his claim to the extorted lands.

Beginning of the war: 1337–60

Gascony under the King of England

In the 11th century, Gascony in southwest France had been incorporated into Aquitaine (also known as Guyenne or Guienne) and formed with it the province of Guyenne and Gascony (French: Guyenne-et-Gascogne). The Angevin kings of England became Dukes of Aquitaine after Henry II married the former Queen of France, Eleanor of Aquitaine, in 1152, from which point the lands were held in vassalage to the French crown. By the 13th century the terms Aquitaine, Guyenne and Gascony were virtually synonymous.[7][8] At the beginning of Edward III's reign on 1 February 1327, the only part of Aquitaine that remained in his hands was the Duchy of Gascony. The term Gascony came to be used for the territory held by the Angevin (Plantagenet) Kings of England in southwest France, although they still used the title Duke of Aquitaine.[8][9]

For the first 10 years of Edward III's reign, Gascony had been a major point of friction. The English argued that, as Charles IV had not acted in a proper way towards his tenant, Edward should be able to hold the duchy free of any French suzerainty. However, this line of argument could not be maintained by the English, so in 1329 the 17-year old Edward III paid homage to Philip VI. Tradition demanded that vassals should approach their liege unarmed with heads uncovered, however Edward demonstrated his reluctance by attending the ceremony by wearing his crown and sword.[10] Despite Edward complying, albeit reluctantly, the French continued to pressure the English administration.[11]

Gascony was not the only sore point. One of Edward's influential advisers was Robert III of Artois. Robert was an exile from the French court, having fallen out with Philip VI over an inheritance claim. He urged Edward to start a war to reclaim France and was able to provide extensive intelligence on the French court.[12]

Franco-Scot alliance

See also: Auld Alliance

The Kings of England had attempted to subjugate the Scots for some time, which made Scotland a natural ally of France. In 1295 a treaty was signed between France and Scotland during the reign of Philip the Fair. Charles IV formally renewed the treaty in 1326, promising Scotland that if England invaded then France would support the Scots. Similarly, the French would find Scottish support if their own kingdom was attacked. Edward could not succeed in his plans for Scotland if they could count on French support.[11]

Philip VI had assembled a large naval fleet off Marseilles as part of an ambitious plan for a crusade to the Holy Land. However the plan was abandoned and the fleet, including elements of the Scottish Navy, moved to the English Channel off Normandy in 1336, threatening England.[12] To deal with this crisis, Edward proposed that the English raise two armies, one to deal with the Scots "at a suitable time", the other to proceed at once to Gascony. At the same time ambassadors were to be sent to France with a proposed treaty for the French king.[13]

End of homage

At the end of April 1337, Philip of France was invited to meet the delegation from England but refused. The arrière-ban, literally a call to arms, was proclaimed throughout France starting on 30 April 1337. Then, in May 1337, Philip met with his Great Council in Paris. It was agreed that the Duchy of Aquitaine, effectively Gascony, should be taken back into the king's hands on the grounds that Edward III was in breach of his obligations as vassal and had sheltered the king's 'mortal enemy' Robert d'Artois.[14] Edward responded to the confiscation of Aquitaine by challenging Philip's right to the French throne. When Charles IV died, Edward had made a claim for the succession of the French throne, through the right of his mother Isabella (Charles IV's sister), daughter of Philip IV. Any claim was considered invalidated by Edward's homage to Philip VI in 1329. Edward revived his claim and in 1340 formally assumed the title 'King of France and the French Royal Arms'.[15]

On 26 January 1340, Edward III formally received homage from Guy, half-brother of the Count of Flanders. The civic authorities of Ghent, Ypres and Bruges proclaimed Edward King of France. Edward's purpose was to strengthen his alliances with the Low Countries. His supporters would be able to claim that they were loyal to the "true" King of France and were not rebels against Philip. In February 1340, Edward returned to England to try and raise more funds and also deal with political difficulties.[16]

Relations with Flanders were also tied to the English wool trade, since Flanders' principal cities relied heavily on textile production and England supplied much of the raw material they needed. Edward III had commanded that his chancellor sit on the woolsack in council as a symbol of the pre-eminence of the wool trade.[17] At the time there were about 110,000 sheep in Sussex alone.[18] The great medieval English monasteries produced large surpluses of wool that were sold to Europe. Successive governments were able to make large amounts of money by taxing it.[17] France's sea power led to economic disruptions for England, shrinking the wool trade to Flanders and the wine trade from Gascony.[19][20]

Outbreak, the English Channel and Brittany

Battle of Sluys from a manuscript of Froissart's Chronicles, Bruge, c.1470

Edward, with his fleet, sailed from England on 22 June 1340, and arrived the next day off the Zwyn estuary. The French fleet assumed a defensive formation off the port of Sluys. The English fleet apparently tricked the French into believing they were withdrawing. However, when the wind turned in the late afternoon, the English attacked with the wind and sun behind them. The French fleet was almost completely destroyed in what became known as the Battle of Sluys. England dominated the English Channel for the rest of the war, preventing French invasions.[16] At this point, Edward's funds ran out and the war probably would have ended were it not for the death of the Duke of Brittany precipitating a succession dispute between the duke's half brother John of Montfort and Charles of Blois, nephew of Philip VI.[21]

In 1341, conflict over the succession to the Duchy of Brittany began the Breton War of Succession, in which Edward backed John of Montfort and Philip backed Charles of Blois. Action for the next few years focused around a back and forth struggle in Brittany. The city of Vannes changed hands several times, while further campaigns in Gascony met with mixed success for both sides.[21]

Battle of Crécy and the taking of Calais

In July 1346, Edward mounted a major invasion across the channel, landing in Normandy's Cotentin, at St. Vaast. The English army captured the completely unguarded Caen in just one day, surprising the French. Philip gathered a large army to oppose Edward, who chose to march northward toward the Low Countries, pillaging as he went, rather than attempting to take and hold territory. He reached the river Seine to find most of the crossings destroyed. He moved further and further south, worryingly close to Paris, until he found the crossing at Poissy. This had only been partially destroyed, so the carpenters within his army were able to fix it. He then continued on his way to Flanders until he reached the river Somme. The army crossed at a tidal ford at Blanchetaque, leaving Philip's army stranded. Edward, assisted by this head start, continued on his way to Flanders once more, until, finding himself unable to outmanoeuvre Philip, Edward positioned his forces for battle and Philip's army attacked. The Battle of Crécy was a complete disaster for the French, largely credited to the English longbowmen and the French king, who allowed his army to attack before it was ready.[22] Philip appealed to his Scottish allies to help with a diversionary attack on England. King David II of Scotland responded by invading northern England, but his army was defeated and he was captured at the Battle of Neville's Cross, on 17 October 1346. This greatly reduced the threat from Scotland.[21][23] In France, Edward proceeded north unopposed and besieged the city of Calais on the English Channel, capturing it in 1347. This became an important strategic asset for the English, allowing them to safely keep troops in northern France.[22] Calais would remain under English control, even after the end of the Hundred Years' War, until the successful French siege in 1558.[24]

Battle of Poitiers and the Treaty of Brétigny

In 1348, the Black Death, which had just arrived in Paris, began to ravage Europe.[25] In 1356, after the plague had passed and England was able to recover financially, Edward's son and namesake, the Prince of Wales, later known as the Black Prince, invaded France from Gascony, winning a great victory in the Battle of Poitiers.[21] During the battle, the Gascon noble Jean de Grailly, captal de Buch led a mounted unit that was concealed in a forest. The French advance was contained, at which point de Grailly led a flanking movement with his horsemen cutting off the French retreat and succeeding in capturing King John II of France (known as John the Good) and many of his nobles.[26][27] With John held hostage, his son the Dauphin (later to become Charles V of France) took over as regent.[28]

After the Battle of Poitiers, chaos ruled, as many French nobles and mercenaries rampaged. A contemporary report said:

... all went ill with the kingdom and the State was undone. Thieves and robbers rose up everywhere in the land. The Nobles despised and hated all others and took no thought for usefulness and profit of lord and men. They subjected and despoiled the peasants and the men of the villages. In no wise did they defend their country from its enemies; rather did they trample it underfoot, robbing and pillaging the peasants' goods...
From the Chronicles of Jean de Venette[29]

Edward invaded France, for the third and last time, hoping to capitalise on the discontent and seize the throne. The Dauphin's strategy was that of non-engagement with the English army in the field. However Edward wanted the crown and chose the cathedral city of Reims for his coronation (Reims was the traditional coronation city).[30] However, the citizens of Reims built and reinforced the city's defences before Edward and his army arrived.[31] Edward besieged the city for five weeks, but the defences held and there was no coronation.[30] Edward moved on to Paris, but retreated after a few skirmishes in the suburbs. The French made contact with him and forced him to negotiate.[32] A conference was held at Brétigny that resulted in the Treaty of Brétigny (8 May 1360). The treaty was ratified at Calais in October. In return for increased lands in Aquitaine, Edward renounced Normandy, Touraine, Anjou and Maine and consented to reducing King John's ransom by a million crowns. Edward also abandoned his claim to the crown of France.[26][28][33]

First peace: 1360–69

The French king, John II, had been held captive in England. The Treaty of Brétigny set his ransom at 3 million crowns and allowed for hostages to be held in lieu of John. The hostages included two of his sons, several princes and nobles, four inhabitants of Paris, and two citizens from each of the nineteen principal towns of France. While these hostages were held, John returned to France to try and raise funds to pay the ransom. In 1362 John's son Louis of Anjou, a hostage in English-held Calais, escaped captivity. So, with his stand-in hostage gone, John felt honour-bound to return to captivity in England.[28][33]

The French crown had been at odds with Navarre (near southern Gascony) since 1354 and in 1363 the Navarrese used John II's captivity in London and the political weakness of the Dauphin to try to seize power.[34] Although there was no formal treaty, Edward III supported the Navarrese moves particularly as there was a prospect that he might gain control over the northern and western provinces as a consequence. With this in mind Edward deliberately slowed the peace negotiations.[35] In 1364, John II died in London, while still in honourable captivity.[36] Charles V succeeded him as king of France.[28][37] On 6 May 1364, one month after the dauphin's accession and three days before his coronation as Charles V, the Navarrese suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Cocherel.[38]

French ascendancy under Charles V: 1369–89

Aquitaine and Castile

File:Du Guesclin Dinan.jpg
Statue of Bertrand du Guesclin in Dinan
File:Ofensivas Tovar-Vienne contra Inglaterra 01.jpg
The Franco-Castilian Navy, led by Admirals de Vienne and Tovar, managed to raid the English coasts for the first time since the beginning of the Hundred Years' War.

In 1366 there was a civil war of succession in Castile (part of modern Spain). The ruler Peter of Castile's forces were pitched against those of his half-brother Henry of Trastámara. The English crown supported Peter and the French, Henry. French forces were led by Bertrand du Guesclin, a Breton, who rose from relatively humble beginnings to prominence as one of France's war leaders. Charles V provided a force of 12,000, with du Guesclin at their head, to support Trastámara in his invasion of Castile.[39]

Peter appealed to England and Aquitaine's Black Prince for help, but none was forthcoming, forcing Peter into exile in Aquitaine. The Black Prince had previously agreed to support Peter's claims but concerns over the terms of the treaty of Brétigny led him to assist Peter as a representative of Aquitaine, rather than England. He then led an Anglo-Gascon army into Castille. Peter was restored to power after Trastámara's army was defeated at the Battle of Najera.[40]

Although the Castilians had agreed to fund the Black Prince, they failed to do so. The Prince was suffering from ill health and returned with his army to Aquitaine. To pay off debts incurred during the Castille campaign, the prince instituted a hearth tax. Arnaud-Amanieu VIII, Lord of Albret had fought on the Black Prince's side during the war. Albret, who already had become discontented by the influx of English administrators into the enlarged Aquitaine, refused to allow the tax to be collected in his fief. He then joined a group of Gascon lords who appealed to Charles V for support in their refusal to pay the tax. Charles V summoned one Gascon lord and the Black Prince to hear the case in his parlement in Paris. The Black Prince's answer was that he would go to Paris with sixty thousand men behind him. War broke out again and Edward III resumed the title of King of France.[41] Charles V declared that all the English possessions in France were forfeited and before the end of 1369 all Aquitaine was in full revolt.[41][42]

With the Black Prince gone from Castile, Henry de Trastámara led a second invasion that ended with Peter's death at the Battle of Montiel in March, 1369. The new Castilian regime provided naval support to French campaigns against Aquitaine and England.[40]

English turmoil

With his health continuing to deteriorate, the Black Prince returned to England in January 1371, where by now his father Edward III was elderly and also in poor health. The prince's illness was debilitating. He died on 8 June 1376.[43] Edward III only just outlived his son and died the following year on 21 June 1377;[44] he was succeeded by the Black Prince's second son Richard II who was still a child.[45] The treaty at Brétigny left Edward III and England with enlarged holdings in France, however a small professional French army under the leadership of du Guesclin pushed the English back and, by the time of Charles V's death in 1380, the English only held Calais.[46]

It was usual to appoint a regent in the case of a child monarch, but no regent was appointed for Richard II, who nominally exercised the power of kingship from the date of his accession in 1377.[45] However, between 1377 and 1380, actual power was in the hands of a series of councils. The political community preferred this to a regency led by the king's uncle, John of Gaunt, although Gaunt remained highly influential.[45]

Richard faced many challenges during his reign, including the Peasants' Revolt led by Wat Tyler in 1381, an Anglo-Scottish war in 1384–85. His attempts to raise taxes to pay for his Scottish adventure and for the protection of Calais against the French made him increasingly unpopular.[45]

Second peace: 1389–1415

The war became increasingly unpopular with the English public largely due to the high taxes needed to sustain it. These taxes were seen as one of the reasons for the Peasants revolt.[47] Richard's increasing disinterest in the war together with his preferential treatment of a select few close friends and advisors angered an alliance of lords that included one of his uncles. This group, known as Lords Appellant, managed to successfully press charges of treason against five of Richard's advisors and friends in the Merciless Parliament. The Lords Appellant were able to gain control of the council in 1388 and tried, unsuccessfully, to reignite the war. Although the will was there, the funds to pay the troops was lacking, so in the autumn of 1388 the Council agreed to resume negotiations with the French crown, beginning on 18 June 1389 with the signing of a three-year truce at Leulinghen.[47][48]

In 1389, Richard's uncle and supporter, John of Gaunt, returned from Spain and Richard was able to rebuild his power gradually until 1397, when he reasserted his authority and destroyed the principal three among the Lords Appellant. In 1399, after John of Gaunt died, Richard II disinherited Gaunt's son, the exiled Henry of Bolingbroke. Bolingbroke returned to England with his supporters and deposed Richard and had himself crowned Henry IV.[45][48][49]

In Scotland, the English regime change prompted border raids that were countered by an invasion in 1402 and the defeat of a Scottish army at the Battle of Homildon Hill.[50] A dispute over the spoils between Henry and Henry Percy, 1st Earl of Northumberland resulted in a long and bloody struggle between the two for control of northern England, resolved only with the almost complete destruction of the Percy family by 1408.[51][52]

In Wales, Owain Glyndŵr was declared Prince of Wales on 16 September 1400. He was the leader of the most serious and widespread rebellion against English authority in Wales since the conquest of 1282–3. The rebellion was finally put down only in 1415 and resulted in Welsh semi-independence for a number of years.[53]

In the meantime Charles VI of France was descending into madness and an open conflict for power began between his cousin John the Fearless and his brother, Louis of Orléans. After Louis's assassination, the Armagnac family took political power in opposition to John. By 1410, both sides were bidding for the help of English forces in a civil war.[49] In 1418 Paris was taken by the Burgundians, who massacred the Count of Armagnac and about 2,500 of his followers.[54]

Throughout this period, England confronted repeated raids by pirates that heavily damaged trade and the navy. There is some evidence that Henry IV used state-legalised piracy as a form of warfare in the English Channel. He used such privateering campaigns to pressure enemies without risking open war.[55] The French responded in kind and French pirates, under Scottish protection, raided many English coastal towns.[56]

The domestic and dynastic difficulties faced by England and France in this period quieted the war for a decade.[56]

Henry IV of England died in 1413 and was replaced by his eldest son Henry V. Charles VI of France's mental illness allowed his power to be exercised by royal princes whose rivalries caused deep divisions in France. Henry V was well aware of these divisions and hoped to exploit them. In 1414 while he held court at Leicester, he received ambassadors from Burgundy.[57]

Henry accredited envoys to the French king to make clear his territorial claims in France; he also demanded the hand of Charles VI's youngest daughter Catherine of Valois. The French rejected his demands, leading Henry to prepare for war.[57]

Resumption of the war under Henry V: 1415–29

Burgundy alliance and the taking of Paris

Battle of Agincourt (1415)

File:Agincourt miniature.JPG
Fifteenth-century miniature depicting the Battle of Agincourt.
Main article: Battle of Agincourt
File:Clan member crest badge - Clan Carmichael.svg
Clan Carmichael crest with broken spear commemorating the unseating of the Duke of Clarence.

In August 1415, Henry V sailed from England with a force of about 10,500 and laid siege to Harfleur. The city resisted for longer than expected, but finally surrendered on 22 September 1415. Because of the unexpected delay, most of the campaign season was gone. Rather than march on Paris directly, he elected to make a raiding expedition across France toward English-occupied Calais. In a campaign reminiscent of Crécy, he found himself outmaneuvered and low on supplies and had to fight a much larger French army at the Battle of Agincourt, north of the Somme. Despite the problems and having a smaller force, his victory was near-total; the French defeat was catastrophic, costing many of the Armagnac leaders. About 40% of the French nobility was killed.[58] Henry was apparently concerned that the large number of prisoners taken were a security risk (there were more French prisoners than the entire English army) and he ordered their deaths.[57]

Treaty of Troyes (1420)

Henry retook much of Normandy, including Caen in 1417, and Rouen on 19 January 1419, turning Normandy English for the first time in two centuries. A formal alliance was made with the Duchy of Burgundy, which had taken Paris after the assassination of Duke John the Fearless in 1419. In 1420, Henry met with King Charles VI. They signed the Treaty of Troyes, by which Henry finally married Charles' daughter Catherine of Valois and Henry's heirs would inherit the throne of France. The Dauphin, Charles VII, was declared illegitimate. Henry formally entered Paris later that year and the agreement was ratified by the Estates-General.[57]

Death of Clarence (1421)

On 22 March 1421 Henry V's progress in his French campaign experienced an unexpected reverse. Henry had left his brother and presumptive heir Thomas, Duke of Clarence in charge while he returned to England. Clarence engaged a Franco-Scottish force of 5000 men, led by John Stewart, Earl of Buchan at the Battle of Baugé. Clarence, against the advice of his lieutenants, before his army had been fully assembled, attacked with a force of no more than 1500 men-at-arms. He then, during the course of the battle, led a charge of a few hundred men into the main body of the Franco-Scottish army, who quickly enveloped the English. In the ensuing melée, the Scot, John Carmichael of Douglasdale, broke his lance unhorsing the Duke of Clarence. Once on the ground, the duke was slain by Alexander Buchanan.[57][59] The body of the Duke of Clarence was recovered from the field by Thomas Montacute, 4th Earl of Salisbury, who conducted the English retreat.[60]

English success

Henry V returned to France and went to Paris, then visiting Chartres and Gâtinais before returning to Paris. From there he decided to attack the Dauphin-held town of Meaux. It turned out to be more difficult to overcome than first thought. The siege began about 6 October 1421, and the town held for seven months before finally falling on 11 May 1422.[57]

At the end of May, Henry was joined by his queen and together with the French court, they went to rest at Senlis. While there it became apparent that he was ill (possibly dysentery) and when he set out to the Upper Loire he diverted to the royal castle at Vincennes, near Paris, where he died on 31 August 1422.[57] The elderly and insane Charles VI of France died two months later, on 21 October 1422. Henry left an only child, his nine-month-old son, Henry, later to become Henry VI.[61]

On his deathbed, Henry V had given the Duke of Bedford responsibility for English France (as Henry VI was only an infant). The war in France continued under Bedford's generalship and several battles were won. The English won an emphatic victory at the Battle of Verneuil, (17 August 1424). At the Battle of Baugé, Clarence had rushed into battle without the support of his archers. At Verneuil the archers fought to devastating effect against the Franco-Scottish army. The effect of the battle was to virtually destroy the Dauphin's field army and to eliminate the Scots as a significant military force for the rest of the war.[61][62]

French victory: 1429–53

Joan of Arc and French revival

Joan of Arc's appearance sparked a revival of French spirit and the tide began to turn against the English.[61]

In 1428, the English laid siege to Orléans. Their force was insufficient to fully invest the city. In 1429 Joan convinced the Dauphin to send her to the siege, saying she had received visions from God telling her to drive out the English. She raised the morale of the troops and they attacked the English redoubts, forcing the English to lift the siege. Inspired by Joan, the French took several English strongholds on the Loire.[63]

The English retreated from the Loire Valley, pursued by a French army. Near the village of Patay, French cavalry broke through a unit of English longbowmen that had been sent to block the road, then swept through the retreating English army. The English lost 2,200 men, and the commander John Talbot, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury was taken prisoner. This victory opened the way for the Dauphin to march to Reims for his coronation as Charles VII (16 July 1429).[63][64]

After the coronation, Charles VII's army fared less well. An attempted French siege of Paris was defeated on 8 September 1429, and Charles VII withdrew back to the Loire Valley.[65]

Henry's coronations and the desertion of Burgundy

Henry VI was crowned king of England at Westminster Abbey on 5 November 1429 and king of France at Notre-Dame, in Paris, on 16 December 1431.[61]

File:Siege orleans.jpg
The first Western image of a battle with cannon: the Siege of Orléans in 1429.

Joan was captured by the Burgundians at the siege of Compiegne on 23 May 1430. The Burgundians transferred her to the English, who organised a trial headed by Pierre Cauchon, a pro-English clergyman. Joan was burned at the stake on 30 May 1431.[63](She was rehabilitated 25 years later by Pope Callixtus III).

After Joan of Arc's death the fortunes of war turned dramatically against the English.[66] Most of Henry's royal advisers were against making peace. Among the factions, the Duke of Bedford wanted to defend Normandy, the Duke of Gloucester was committed to just Calais whereas Cardinal Beaufort was inclined to peace. Negotiations stalled. It seems that at the congress of Arras, in the summer of 1435, where the duke of Beaufort was mediator, the English were unrealistic in their demands. A few days after the congress ended in September, Philip III, duke of Burgundy deserted to Charles VII, signing the Treaty of Arras that returned Paris to the King of France. This was a major blow to English sovereignty in France.[61] The Duke of Bedford died 14 September 1435 and was replaced by a lesser man.[66]

French resurgence

File:Vigiles du roi Charles VII 32.jpg
The Battle of Formigny (1450)

Burgundy's allegiance remained fickle, but the English focus on expanding their domains into the Low Countries left them little energy to intervene in France.[67] The long truces that marked the war gave Charles time to centralise the French state and reorganise his army and government, replacing his feudal levies with a more modern professional army that could put its superior numbers to good use. A castle that once could only be captured after a prolonged siege would now fall after a few days from cannon bombardment. The French artillery developed a reputation as the best in the world.[66]

By 1449, the French had retaken Rouen and in 1450 the Count of Clermont and Arthur de Richemont, Earl of Richmond, of the Montfort family (the future Arthur III, Duke of Brittany) caught an English army attempting to relieve Caen at the Battle of Formigny and defeated it. The English army had been attacked from the flank and rear by Richemont's force just as they were on the verge of beating Clermont's army.[68]

Fall of Gascony

After Charles VII's successful Normandy campaign in 1450, he concentrated his efforts on Gascony, the last province held by the English. Bordeaux, Gascony's capital, was besieged and surrendered to the French on 30 June 1451. Largely due to the English sympathies of the Gascon people this was reversed when John Talbot and his army retook the city on 23 October 1452. However, the English were defeated at the Battle of Castillon on 17 July 1453. Talbot had been persuaded to engage the French army at Castillon near Bordeaux. During the battle the French appeared to retreat towards their camp. The French camp at Castillon had been laid out by Charles VII's ordnance officer Jean Bureau and this was instrumental in the French success as when the French cannon opened fire, from their positions in the camp, the English took severe casualties losing both Talbot and his son.[69]

End of the war

Although the Battle of Castillon is considered the last battle of the Hundred Years' War,[69] England and France remained formally at war for another 20 years, but the English were in no position to carry on the war as they faced unrest at home. Following defeat in the Hundred Years' War, English landowners complained vociferously about the financial losses resulting from the loss of their continental holdings; this is often considered a major cause of the War of the Roses, that started in 1455.[66][70]

The Hundred Years' War almost resumed in 1474, when the duke Charles of Burgundy, counting on English support, took up arms against Louis XI of France. Louis managed to isolate the Burgundians by buying Edward IV of England off with a large cash sum and an annual pension, in an agreement signed at the Treaty of Picquigny (1475). The treaty formally ended the Hundred Years' War with Edward renouncing his claim to the throne of France. However, future Kings of England continued to keep the lilies of France (Fleur-de-lis) on their coat of arms and even bore the title, until 1803, when they were dropped in deference to the exiled Count of Provence, titular King Louis XVIII of France, who was living in England after the French Revolution.[71]

Charles the Bold, the last duke of Burgundy, was killed at the Battle of Nancy in 1477,[72] leaving a daughter, Mary, who lost the provinces of Artois, Flanders, Picardy and Burgundy to Louis XI's armies.[72]


File:Map France 1477-en.svg
Burgundian territories (orange/yellow) and limits of France (red) after the Burgundian War.

The Hundred Years' War was a time of rapid military evolution. Weapons, tactics, army structure and the social meaning of war all changed, partly in response to the war's costs, partly through advancement in technology and partly through lessons that warfare taught.The feudal system was slowly disintegrating throughout the hundred years war.

Before the Hundred Years' War, heavy cavalry was considered the most powerful unit in an army, but by the war's end, this belief had shifted. The heavy horse was increasingly negated by the use of the longbow (and, later, another long-distance weapon: firearms). Edward III was famous for dismounting his men-at-arms and having them and his archers stand in closely integrated battle lines; the horses only being used for transport or pursuit.[73] The English began using lightly armoured mounted troops, known as hobelars. Hoblars tactics had been developed against the Scots, in the Anglo-Scottish wars of the 14th century. Hobelars rode smaller unarmoured horses, enabling them to move through difficult or boggy terrain where heavier cavalry would struggle. Rather than fight while seated on the horse, they would dismount to engage the enemy.[74][75][76]

By the end of the Hundred Years' War, these various factors caused the decline of the expensively outfitted, highly trained heavy cavalry and the eventual end of the armoured knight as a military force and of the nobility as a political one.[76]

The war stimulated nationalistic sentiment. It devastated France as a land, but it also awakened French nationalism. The Hundred Years' War accelerated the process of transforming France from a feudal monarchy to a centralised state.[77] In 1445 the first regular standing army since Roman times was organised in France partly as a solution to marauding free companies. The mercenary companies were given a choice of either joining the Royal army as compagnies d'ordonnance on a permanent basis, or being hunted down and destroyed if they refused. France gained a total standing army of around 6,000 men, which was sent out to gradually eliminate the remaining mercenaries who insisted on operating on their own. The new standing army had a more disciplined and professional approach to warfare than its predecessors.[76]

The conflict developed such that it was not just between the Kings of England and France but also between their respective peoples. There were constant rumours in England that the French meant to invade and destroy the English language. National feeling that emerged from such rumours unified both France and England further. The Hundred Years' War basically confirmed the fall of the French language in England, which had served as the language of the ruling classes and commerce there from the time of the Norman conquest until 1362.[77]

File:Bubonic plague map.PNG
The spread of the Black Death (with modern borders).

Lowe (1997) argued that opposition to the war helped to shape England's early modern political culture. Although anti-war and pro-peace spokesmen generally failed to influence outcomes at the time, they had a long-term impact. England showed decreasing enthusiasm for conflict deemed not in the national interest, yielding only losses in return for high economic burdens. In comparing this English cost-benefit analysis with French attitudes, given that both countries suffered from weak leaders and undisciplined soldiers, Lowe noted that the French understood that warfare was necessary to expel the foreigners occupying their homeland. Furthermore French kings found alternative ways to finance the war – sales taxes, debasing the coinage – and were less dependent than the English on tax levies passed by national legislatures. English anti-war critics thus had more to work with than the French.[78]

Bubonic plague and warfare reduced population numbers throughout Europe during this period. France lost half its population during the Hundred Years' War.[58] Normandy lost three-quarters of its population, and Paris two-thirds.[79] The population of England was reduced by 20 to 33 percent due to plague in the same period.[80]



Important figures


Arms Historical Figure Life Notes
100px King Philip VI 1293–1350, reigned 1328–50 Charles of Valois' son
King John II 1319–1364, reigned 1350–64 Philip VI's son
King Charles V 1338–1380, reigned 1364–80 John II's son
100px Bertrand du Guesclin 1320–80 Commander
100px Louis I, Duke of Anjou 1339–1384, regent 1380–82 John II's son
100px King Charles VI 1368–1422, reigned 1380–1422 Charles V's son
King Charles VII 1403–1461, reigned 1422–61 Charles VI's son
100px Jean II, Duke of Alençon 1409–1476 Commander
100px Jean de Dunois 1402–68 Commander
100px Jean Poton de Xaintrailles 1390–1461 Commander
100px La Hire 1390–1443 Commander
100px Jean Bureau 1390–1463 Master Gunner
100px Gilles de Rais 1405–40 Commander
100px Joan of Arc 1412–31 Religious visionary


Arms Historical Figure Life Notes
100px Isabella of France 1295–1358 Queen consort of England, wife of Edward II, mother of Edward III, regent of England, sister of Charles IV and daughter of Philip IV of France
100px King Edward III 1312–1377, reigned 1327–77 Philip IV's grandson
100px Henry of Grosmont, 1st Duke of Lancaster 1310–61 Commander
100px Edward, the Black Prince 1330–76 Edward III's son
100px John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster 1340–99 Edward III's son
100px King Richard II 1367–1400, reigned 1377–99 Edward III's grandson
100px King Henry IV 1367–1413, reigned 1399–1413 John of Gaunt's son, Edward III's grandson
100px King Henry V 1387–1422, reigned 1413–22 Henry IV's son
100px Catherine of Valois 1401–37 Queen consort of England, daughter of Charles VI of France, mother of Henry VI of England and by her second marriage grandmother of Henry VII
100px John of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Bedford 1389–1435, regent 1422–1435 Henry IV's son
100px Sir John Fastolf[64] 1380–1459 Commander
100px John Talbot, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury 1384–1453 Commander
100px King Henry VI 1421–1471, reigned 1422–61 Henry V's son
100px Richard Plantagenet, 3rd Duke of York 1411–60 Commander


Arms Historical Figure Life Notes
100px Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy 1342–1404, duke 1363–1404 Son of John II of France
100px John the Fearless, Duke of Burgundy 1371–1419, duke 1404–19 Son of Philip the Bold
100px Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy 1396–1467, duke 1419–67 Son of John the Fearless

See also


  1. ^ As noted in, e.g., Gregory D. Cleva, Henry Kissinger and the American Approach to Foreign Policy, Bucknell University Press, 1989; p. 87 ("the English Channel gave the nation a sense of geographical remoteness", while its "navy fostered a sense of physical unassailability" that lasted until the early 20th century).
  2. ^ a b Brissaud 1915, pp. 329–330
  3. ^ Previte-Orton 1978, p. 872
  4. ^ Bartlett 2000, p. 22
  5. ^ Bartlett 2000, p. 17
  6. ^ Gormley 2007 [1] Ohio State University
  7. ^ Harris 1994, p. 8
  8. ^ a b Prestwich 1988, p. 298
  9. ^ Prestwich 2005, pp. 292–293
  10. ^ Wilson 2011, p. 194
  11. ^ a b Prestwich 2005, p. 394
  12. ^ a b Prestwich 2005, p. 306
  13. ^ Sumption 1991, p. 180
  14. ^ Sumption 1991, p. 184
  15. ^ Prestwich 2003, pp. 149–150
  16. ^ a b Prestwich 2005, pp. 307–312
  17. ^ a b Friar 2004, pp. 480–481
  18. ^ R.E.Glassock. England circa 1334 in Darby 1976 New Edition, p. 160
  19. ^ Sumption 1991, pp. 188–189
  20. ^ Sumption 1991, pp. 233–234
  21. ^ a b c d Rogers 2010, pp. 88–89
  22. ^ a b Prestwich 2005, pp. 318–319
  23. ^ Rogers 2010, pp. 55–45
  24. ^ Grummitt 2008, p. 1
  25. ^ The Black Death, transl. & ed. Rosemay Horrox, (Manchester University Press, 1994), 9.
  26. ^ a b Le Patourel 1984, pp. 20–21
  27. ^ Wilson 2011, p. 218
  28. ^ a b c d Guignebert 1930, Volume 1. pp.304–307
  29. ^ de Venette 1953, p. 66
  30. ^ a b Prestwich 2005, p. 326
  31. ^ Le Patourel 1984, p. 189
  32. ^ Le Patourel 1984, p. 32
  33. ^ a b 12px s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Brétigny.
  34. ^ Wagner 2006, pp. 102–103
  35. ^ Ormrod. Edward III. p. 384
  36. ^ Backman 2003, pp. 179–180 – Nobles captured in battle were held in "Honorable Captivity", which recognised their status as prisoners of war and permitted ransom.
  37. ^ Britannica. Treaty of Brétigny. Retrieved 21 September 2012
  38. ^ Wagner 2006, pp. 86
  39. ^ Curry 2002, pp. 69–70
  40. ^ a b Wagner 2006, p. 78
  41. ^ a b Wagner 2006, p. 122
  42. ^ Wagner 2006, pp. 3–4
  43. ^ Barber, Richard (2008). "Edward , prince of Wales and of Aquitaine (1330–76) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn. Subscription Required". Retrieved 3 October 2012. 
  44. ^ Omrod, W. M (2008). "Edward III (1312–1377) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn. Subscription Required". Retrieved 3 October 2012. 
  45. ^ a b c d e Tuck, Richard (2008). "Richard II (1367–1400 in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn. Subscription Required". Retrieved 3 October 2012. 
  46. ^ Francoise Autrand. Charles V King of France in Vauchéz. Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages. Volume 1. pp. 283–284
  47. ^ a b Baker 2000, p. 6
  48. ^ a b Neillands 1990, pp. 182–184
  49. ^ a b Curry 2002, pp. 77–82
  50. ^ Mortimer 2008, pp. 253–254
  51. ^ Mortimer 2008, pp. 263–264
  52. ^ Bean, J.M.W (2008). "Percy, Henry, first earl of Northumberland (1341–1408) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn. Subscription Required". Retrieved 8 October 2012. 
  53. ^ Smith, Llinos (2008). "Glyn Dŵr , Owain (c.1359–c.1416) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn. Subscription Required". Retrieved 8 October 2012. 
  54. ^ Sizer, Michael (2007). "The Calamity of Violence: Reading the Paris Massacres of 1418". Retrieved 29 December 2013. 
  55. ^ Ian Friel. The English and War at Sea. c.1200-c1500 in Hattendorf. War at Sea. pp. 76–77
  56. ^ a b Nolan. The Age of Wars of Religion. p. 424
  57. ^ a b c d e f g Allmand, C.T (2008). "Henry V (1386–1422) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn. Subscription Required". Retrieved 8 October 2012. 
  58. ^ a b Turchin 2003, pp. 179–180Historical dynamics: why states rise and fall
  59. ^ Wagner 2006, pp. 44–45
  60. ^ G. L. Harriss, ‘Thomas , duke of Clarence (1387–1421)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Sept 2010 accessed 14 May 2013 Subscription required.
  61. ^ a b c d e Griffiths 2004
  62. ^ Wagner 2006, pp. 307–308
  63. ^ a b c Davis 2003, pp. 76–80
  64. ^ a b "Sir John Fastolf". Norwich: Norfolk Record Office. Retrieved 20 December 2012. 
  65. ^ Jaques, Tony. 2007. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. p. 777. Retrieved January 21, 2015. 
  66. ^ a b c d Lee 1998, pp. 145–147
  67. ^ Sumption 1991, p. 562
  68. ^ Nicole 2012, pp. 26–35
  69. ^ a b Wagner 2006, p. 79
  70. ^ Webster 1998, pp. 39–40: "Every version of the complaints put forward by the rebels in 1450 harps on the losses in France."
  71. ^ Neillands 1990, pp. 290–291
  72. ^ a b Charles Derek Ross, Edward IV, (University of California Press, 1974), 249–250.
  73. ^ Powicke 1962, p. 189
  74. ^ Colm McNamee. Hobelars in Rogers 2010, pp. 267–268
  75. ^ Jones 2008, pp. 1–17
  76. ^ a b c Preston, Wise & Werner 1991, pp. 84–89
  77. ^ a b Holmes, Urban & Schutz 1948, p. 61
  78. ^ Lowe 1997, pp. 147–195
  79. ^ Ladurie 1987, p. 32The French peasantry, 1450–1660
  80. ^ Neillands 1990, pp. 110–111


  • Baker, Denise Nowakowski, ed. (2000). Inscribing the Hundred Years' War in French and English Cultures. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 0791447014. 
  • Backman, Clifford R (2003). The Worlds of Medieval Europe. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-1953-3527-9. 
  • Bartlett, Robert (2000). J.M.Roberts, ed. England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings 1075 -1225. London: OUP. ISBN 978-0-19-925101-8. 
  • Brissaud, Jean (1915). Garner, James W. Tr, ed. History of French Public Law. The Continental Legal History series. Vol 9. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 
  • Curry, Anne (2002). The Hundred Years War 1337–1453. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-269-5. 
  • Darby, H. C. (1976) [1973]. A New Historical Geography of England before 1600. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-29144-5. 
  • Davis, Paul K (2003). Besieged: 100 Great Sieges from Jericho to Sarajevo 2nd. Ed. Santa Barbara CA: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-521930-9. 
  • "Encyclopædia Britannica Online". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 21 September 2012. 
  • Favier, Jean (1980). La Guerre de Cent Ans. Paris: Fayard. ISBN 978-2-213-00898-1. 
  • Friar, Stephen (2004). The Sutton Companion to Local History. Sparkford, England: Sutton. ISBN 0-7509-2723-2. 
  • Froissart, Jean (1895). Macaulay; George Campbell, ed. The Chronicles of Froissart. John Bourchier Translator; Lord Berners Translator. London: Macmillan and Son. Retrieved 24 September 2012. 
  • Gormley, Larry (2007). "eHistory:The Hundred Years War: Overview". Ohio State University. Retrieved 20 September 2012. 
  • Griffiths, R.A (2004). "Henry VI (1421–1471) in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography; online edn, Sept 2010; Subscription required". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 9 October 2012. 
  • Grummitt, David (2008). The Calais Garrison: War and Military Service in England, 1436–1558. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-84383-398-7. 
  • Guignebert, Charles (1930). A Short History of the French People. Vol 1. F. G. Richmond Translator. New York: Macmilan Company. 
  • Harris, Robin (1994). Studies in History 71: Valois Guyenne. Woodbridge, Surrey: Boydell Press. ISBN 0-86193-226-9. 
  • Hattendorf, John B; Unger, Richard W, eds. (2003). War at Sea in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. ISBN 0-85115-903-6. 
  • Holmes, Jr, Urban T; Schutz, Alexander H (1948). A History of the French Language, Revised ed. Columbus, OH: Harold L. Hedrick. 
  • Jones, Robert (2008). "Re-thinking the origins of the Irish Hobelar" (PDF). Cardiff: Cardiff School of History and Archaeology. Retrieved 8 April 2013. 
  • Lambert, Craig L. "Edward III’s siege of Calais: A reappraisal," Journal of Medieval History (2011) 37#3 pp 231–342
  • Lee, Cristopher (1998). This Sceptred Isle:55BC-1901. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-140-26133-8. 
  • Ladurie, Emmanuel Le Roy (1987). The French peasantry, 1450–1660. Alan Sheridan Translator. Berkeley and LA: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05523-3. 
  • Lowe, Ben (1997). Imagining Peace: History of Early English Pacifist Ideas. University Park PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0271016892. 
  • Mortimer, Ian (2008). The Fears of Henry IV: the Life of England's Self-Made King. London: Jonathan Cape. ISBN 978-1-844-13529-5. 
  • Neillands, Robin (1990). The Hundred Years War, Revised ed. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-26131-7. 
  • Nicolle, David (2012). The Fall of English France 1449–53. Colchester, Essex: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84908-616-5. 
  • Ormrod, W Mark (2001). Edward III. London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-30-011910-7. 
  • Le Patourel, John (1984). Jones, Michael, ed. Feudal Empires:Norman and Plantagenet. London: Hambledon Continuum. ISBN 0-907628-22-2. Retrieved 26 September 2012. 
  • Powicke, Michael (1962). Military Obligation in Medieval England. Oxford: OUP. ISBN 0-198-20695-X. 
  • Preston, Richard; Wise, Sydney F.; Werner, Herman O. (1991). Men in arms: a history of warfare and its interrelationships with Western society. 5th Edition. Beverley MA: Wadsworth Publishing Co Inc. ISBN 0-03-033428-4. 
  • Prestwich, Michael (1988). English Monarchs: Edward I. Berkeley and LA: University of California. ISBN 0-520-06266-3. 
  • Prestwich, Michael (2003). The Three Edwards: War and State in England 1272–1377. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-203-60713-9. 
  • Prestwich, Michael (2005). J.M.Roberts, ed. Plantagenet England. Oxford: OUP. ISBN 978-0-19-922687-0. 
  • Previte-Orton, C.W (1978). The shorter Cambridge Medieval History 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-20963-3. 
  • Rogers, Clifford J, ed. (2010). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-533403-6. 
  • Sumption, Jonathan (1991). The Hundred Years War I: Trial by Battle. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0-8122-1655-5. 
  • Turchin, Peter (2003). Historical dynamics: why states rise and fall. Princeton: Princeton University. ISBN 0-691-11669-5. 
  • Vauchéz, Andre, ed. (2000). Encyclopedia of the Middle ages. Volume 1. Cambridge: James Clark. ISBN 1-57958-282-6. 
  • de Venette, Jean (1953). Newall, Richard A, ed. The Chronicle of Jean de Venette. Translated by Jean Birdsall. New York: Columbia University Press. 
  • Wagner, John A (2006). Encyclopedia of the Hundred Years War. Westport CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-32736-X. 
  • Webster, Bruce (1998). The Wars of the Roses. London: UCL Press. ISBN 1-85728-493-3. 
  • Wilson, Derek (2011). The Plantagenets. The Kings that made Britain. London: Quercus. ISBN 978-0-85738-004-3. 

External links

Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 346: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).