Open Access Articles- Top Results for Prosopagnosia


Classification and external resources
NCI Prosopagnosia
Patient UK Prosopagnosia
MeSH D020238
File:Fusiform gyrus animation.gif
Animation of the fusiform area, the area damaged in prosopagnosia.

Prosopagnosia /ˌprɒsəpæɡˈnʒə/ (Greek: "prosopon" = "face", "agnosia" = "not knowing"), also called face blindness,[1] is a cognitive disorder of face perception where the ability to recognize faces is impaired, while other aspects of visual processing (e.g., object discrimination) and intellectual functioning (e.g., decision making) remain intact. The term originally referred to a condition following acute brain damage (acquired prosopagnosia), but a congenital or developmental form of the disorder also exists, which may affect up to 2.5% of the population.[2] The specific brain area usually associated with prosopagnosia is the fusiform gyrus,[3] which activates specifically in response to faces. The functionality of the fusiform gyrus allows most people to recognize faces in more detail than they do similarly complex inanimate objects. For those with prosopagnosia, the new method for recognizing faces depends on the less-sensitive object recognition system. The right hemisphere fusiform gyrus is more often involved in familiar face recognition than the left. It remains unclear whether the fusiform gyrus is only specific for the recognition of human faces or if it is also involved in highly trained visual stimuli.

There are two types of prosopagnosia: acquired and congenital (developmental). Acquired prosopagnosia results from occipito-temporal lobe damage and is most often found in adults. This is further subdivided into apperceptive and associative prosopagnosia. In congenital prosopagnosia, the individual never adequately develops the ability to recognize faces.[4]

Though there have been several attempts at remediation, no therapies have demonstrated lasting real-world improvements across a group of prosopagnosics. Prosopagnosics often learn to use "piecemeal" or "feature-by-feature" recognition strategies. This may involve secondary clues such as clothing, gait, hair color, body shape, and voice. Because the face seems to function as an important identifying feature in memory, it can also be difficult for people with this condition to keep track of information about people, and socialize normally with others. Prosopagnosia has also been associated with other disorders that are associated with nearby brain areas: left hemianopsia (loss of vision from left side of space, associated with damage to the right occipital lobe), achromatopsia (a deficit in color perception often associated with unilateral or bilateral lesions in the temporo-occipital junction) and topographical disorientation (a loss of environmental familiarity and difficulties in using landmarks, associated with lesions in the posterior part of the parahippocampal gyrus and anterior part of the lingual gyrus of the right hemisphere).[5]


Selective inabilities to recognize faces were documented as early as the 19th century, and included case studies by Hughlings Jackson and Charcot. However, it was not named until the term prosopagnosia was first used in 1947 by Joachim Bodamer, a German neurologist. He described three cases, including a 24-year-old man who suffered a bullet wound to the head and lost his ability to recognize his friends, family, and even his own face. However, he was able to recognize and identify them through other sensory modalities such as auditory, tactile, and even other visual stimuli patterns (such as gait and other physical mannerisms). Bodamer gave his paper the title Die Prosop-Agnosie, derived from Classical Greek πρόσωπον (prósōpon) meaning "face" and αγνωσία (agnōsía) meaning "non-knowledge". In October 1996, Bill Choisser proposed using the term face blindness for this condition.[1] The earliest citation for face blindness is on "Bill's Face Blindness Pages," Bill Choisser, January 1, 1997.[6]

A case of a prosopagnosia is "Dr. P." in Oliver Sacks' 1985 book The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, though this is more properly considered to be one of a more general visual agnosia. Although Dr. P. could not recognize his wife from her face, he was able to recognize her by her voice. His recognition of pictures of his family and friends appeared to be based on highly specific features, such as his brother's square jaw and big teeth. Coincidentally, Oliver Sacks himself suffers from prosopagnosia, but did not know it for much of his life.[7]

The study of prosopagnosia has been crucial in the development of theories of face perception. Because prosopagnosia is not a unitary disorder (i.e., different people may show different types and levels of impairment), it has been argued that face perception involves a number of stages, each of which can cause qualitative differences in impairment that different persons with prosopagnosia may exhibit.[8]

This sort of evidence has been crucial in supporting the theory that there may be a specific face perception system in the brain. Most researchers agree that the facial perception process is holistic rather than featural, as it is for perception of most objects. A holistic perception of the face does not involve any explicit representation of local features (i.e., eyes, nose, mouth, etc.), but rather considers the face as a whole.[9][10][11] Because the prototypical face has a specific spatial layout (eyes are always located above nose, and nose located above mouth), it is beneficial to use a holistic approach to recognize individual/specific faces from a group of similar layouts. This holistic processing of the face is exactly what is damaged in prosopagnosics.[9] They are able to recognize the specific spatial layout and characteristics of facial features, but they are unable to process them as one entire face. This is counterintuitive to many people, as not everyone believes faces are "special" or perceived in a different way from other objects in the rest of the world. Though evidence suggests that other visual objects are processed in a holistic manner (e.g., dogs in dog experts), the size of these effects are smaller and are less consistently demonstrated than with faces. In a study conducted by Diamond and Carey, they showed this to be true by performing tests on dog-show judges. They showed pictures of dogs to the judges and to a control group and they then inverted those same pictures and showed them again. The dog-show judges had greater difficulty in recognizing the dogs once inverted compared to the control group; the inversion effect, the increased difficulty in recognizing a picture once inverted, was shown to be in effect. It was previously believed that the inversion effect was associated only with faces, but this study shows that it may apply to any category of expertise.[12]

It has also been argued that prosopagnosia may be a general impairment in understanding how individual perceptual components make up the structure or gestalt of an object. Psychologist Martha Farah has been particularly associated with this view.[13][14]



Apperceptive prosopagnosia has typically been used to describe cases of acquired prosopagnosia with some of the earliest processes in the face perception system. The brain areas thought to play a critical role in apperceptive prosopagnosia are right occipital temporal regions.[9] People with this disorder cannot make any sense of faces and are unable to make same-different judgments when they are presented with pictures of different faces. They are unable to recognize both familiar and unfamiliar faces. However, they may be able to recognize people based on non-face clues such as their clothing, hairstyle or voice.[15]


Associative prosopagnosia has typically been used to describe cases of acquired prosopagnosia with spared perceptual processes but impaired links between early face perception processes and the semantic information we hold about people in our memories. Right anterior temporal regions may also play a critical role in associative prosopagnosia.[9] People with this form of the disorder may be able to say whether photos of people's faces are the same or different and derive the age and sex from a face (suggesting they can make sense of some face information) but may not be able to subsequently identify the person or provide any information about them such as their name, occupation, or when they were last encountered.[9]


Developmental prosopagnosia (DP), also called Congenital prosopagnosia (CP), is a face-recognition deficit that is lifelong, manifesting in early childhood, and that cannot be attributed to acquired brain damage. A number of studies have found functional deficits in DP both on the basis of EEG measures and fMRI. It has been suggested that a genetic factor is responsible for the condition. The term “hereditary prosopagnosia” was introduced if DP affected more than one family member, essentially accenting the possible genetic contribution of this condition. To examine this possible genetic factor, 689 randomly selected students were administered a survey in which seventeen developmental prosopagnosics were quantifiably identified. Family members of fourteen of the DP individuals were interviewed to determine prosopagnosia-like characteristics, and in all fourteen families, at least one other affected family member was found.[16]

In 2005, a study led by Ingo Kennerknecht showed support for the proposed congenital disorder form of prosopagnosia. This study provides epidemiological evidence that congenital prosopagnosia is a frequently occurring cognitive disorder that often runs in families. The analysis of pedigree trees formed within the study also indicates that the segregation pattern of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) is fully compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance. This mode of inheritance explains why HPA is so common among certain families (Kennerknecht et al. 2006).[17]

There are many developmental disorders associated with an increased likelihood that the person will have difficulties in face perception, of which the person may or may not be aware. The mechanism by which these perceptual deficits take place is largely unknown. A partial list of some disorders that often have prosopagnosiac components would include nonverbal learning disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and autism spectrum disorders in general. However, these types of disorders are very complicated, so arbitrary assumptions should be avoided.[18]

Etiologies and affected brain areas

Prosopagnosia can be caused by lesions in various parts of the inferior occipital areas (occipital face area), fusiform gyrus (fusiform face area), and the anterior temporal cortex.[9] Positron emission topography (PET) and fMRI scans have shown that, in individuals without prosopagnosia, these areas are activated specifically in response to face stimuli.[5] The inferior occipital areas are mainly involved in the early stages of face perception and the anterior temporal structures integrate specific information about the face, voice, and name of a familiar person.[9]

Acquired prosopagnosia can develop as the result of several neurologically damaging causes. Vascular causes of prosopagnosia include posterior cerebral artery infarcts (PCAIs) and hemorrhages in the infero-medial part of the temporo-occipital area. These can be either bilateral or unilateral, but if they are unilateral, they are almost always in the right hemisphere.[5] Recent studies have confirmed that right hemisphere damage to the specific temporo-occipital areas mentioned above is sufficient to induce prosopagnosia. MRI scans of patients with prosopagnosia showed lesions isolated to the right hemisphere, while fMRI scans showed that the left hemisphere was functioning normally.[5] Unilateral left temporo-occipital lesions result in object agnosia, but spare face recognition processes, although a few cases have been documented where left unilateral damage resulted in prosopagnosia. It has been suggested that these face recognition impairments caused by left hemisphere damage are due to a semantic defect blocking retrieval processes that are involved in obtaining person-specific semantic information from the visual modality.[9]

Other less common etiologies include carbon monoxide poisoning, temporal lobectomy, encephalitis, neoplasm, right temporal lobe atrophy, trauma, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease.[5]

Unconscious face recognition

One particularly interesting feature of prosopagnosia is that it suggests both a conscious and unconscious aspect to face recognition. Experiments have shown that when presented with a mixture of familiar and unfamiliar faces, people with prosopagnosia may be unable to successfully identify the people in the pictures, or even make a simple familiarity judgement ("this person seems familiar / unfamiliar"). However, when a measure of emotional response is taken (typically a measure of skin conductance), there tends to be an emotional response to familiar people even though no conscious recognition takes place.[19] This suggests emotion plays a significant role in face recognition, perhaps unsurprising when basic survival (particularly security) relies on identifying the people around you.

It is thought that Capgras delusion may be the reverse of prosopagnosia. In this condition people report conscious recognition of people from faces, but show no emotional response, perhaps leading to the delusional belief that their relative or spouse has been replaced by an impostor.

In children

Developmental prosopagnosia can be a difficult thing for a child to both understand and cope with. Many adults with developmental prosopagnosia report for a long time they had no idea that they had a deficit in face processing, unaware that others could distinguish people solely on facial differences.[20]

Prosopagnosia in children may be overlooked; they may just appear to be very shy or slightly odd due to their inability to recognize faces. They may also have a hard time making friends, as they may not recognize their classmates. They often make friends with children who have very clear, distinguishing features.

Children with prosopagnosia may also have difficulties following the plots of television shows and movies, as they have trouble recognizing the different characters. They tend to gravitate towards cartoons, where the characters always wear the same thing and have other easily recognized distinguishing features. Prosopagnosiac children may also have a hard time telling family members apart, or recognizing people out of context (e.g., the teacher in a grocery store).[21]

Additionally, children with prosopagnosia can have a difficult time with the public school system, as many school professionals are not well versed in prosopagnosia, if they are aware of the disorder at all.[22]

Neuropsychological assessments

There are few neuropsychological assessments that can definitively diagnose prosopagnosia. One commonly used test is the famous faces tests, where individuals are asked to recognize the faces of famous persons. However, this test is difficult to standardize. The Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) is another test used by neuropsychologists to assess face recognition skills. Individuals are presented with a target face above six test faces and are asked to identify which test face matches the target face. The images are cropped to eliminate hair and clothes, as many people with prosopagnosia use hair and clothing cues to recognize faces. Both male and female faces are used during the test. For the first six items only one test face matches the target face; during the next seven items, three of the test faces match the target faces and the poses are different. The reliability of the BFRT was questioned when a study conducted by Duchaine and Nakayama showed that the average score for 11 self-reported prosopagnosics was within the normal range.[23]

The test may be useful for identifying patients with apperceptive prosopagnosia, since this is mainly a matching test and they are unable to recognize both familiar and unfamiliar faces. They would be unable to pass the test. It would not be useful in diagnosing patients with associative prosopagnosia since they are able to match faces.

The Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) is a new test developed by Duchaine and Nakayama to better diagnose people with prosopagnosia. This test initially presents individuals with three images each of six different target faces. They are then presented with many three-image series, which contain one image of a target face and two distracters. Duchaine and Nakayama showed that the CFMT is more accurate and efficient than previous tests in diagnosing patients with prosopagnosia. Their study compared the two tests and 75% of patients were diagnosed by the CFMT, while only 25% of patients were diagnosed by the BFRT. However, similar to the BFRT, patients are being asked to essentially match unfamiliar faces, as they are seen only briefly at the start of the test. The test is not currently widely used and will need further testing before it can be considered reliable.[23]

Notable cases

See also


  1. ^ a b Davis, Joshua (November 2006). "Face Blind". Wired. Retrieved 31 December 2014.  ("[Bill] Choisser had even begun to popularize a name for the condition: face blindness.")
  2. ^ Grüter T, Grüter M, Carbon CC (2008). "Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia". J Neuropsychol 2 (1): 79–97. PMID 19334306. doi:10.1348/174866407X231001. 
  3. ^ Face blindness not just skin deep –
  4. ^ Behrmann M, Avidan G (April 2005). "Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth". Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9 (4): 180–7. PMID 15808500. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011. 
  5. ^ a b c d e Mayer, Eugene; Rossion, Bruno (2007). Olivier Godefroy, Julien Bogousslavsky, ed. Prosopagnosia (PDF). The Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology of Stroke (1 ed.) (New York: Cambridge University Press). pp. 315–334. ISBN 9780521842617. OCLC 468190971. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511544880.017. 
  6. ^ "face blindness". Word Spy. 11 July 2006. Retrieved 31 December 2014. 
  7. ^ Katz, Neil (26 August 2010). "Prosopagnosia: Oliver Sacks' Battle with "Face Blindness"". Retrieved 3 February 2010. 
  8. ^ Young, Andrew W.; Newcombe, F.; de Hanncombe, E.H.F.; Small, M. (1998). Andrew W. Young, ed. Dissociable deficits after brain injury. Face and Mind (Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press). pp. 181–208. ISBN 9780198524212. OCLC 38014705. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524205.003.0006. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Gainotti G, Marra C (2011). "Differential contribution of right and left temporo-occipital and anterior temporal lesions to face recognition disorders". Front Hum Neurosci 5: 55. PMC 3108284. PMID 21687793. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00055. 
  10. ^ Richler JJ, Cheung OS, Gauthier I (April 2011). "Holistic processing predicts face recognition". Psychol Sci 22 (4): 464–71. PMC 3077885. PMID 21393576. doi:10.1177/0956797611401753. 
  11. ^ Richler JJ, Wong YK, Gauthier I (April 2011). "Perceptual Expertise as a Shift from Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing". Curr Dir Psychol Sci 20 (2): 129–134. PMC 3104280. PMID 21643512. doi:10.1177/0963721411402472. 
  12. ^ Diamond, R.; Carey, S. (June 1986). "Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise". Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (2): 107–117. PMID 2940312. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107. 
  13. ^ Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN (July 1998). "What is "special" about face perception?". Psychol Rev 105 (3): 482–98. PMID 9697428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482. 
  14. ^ Farah, Martha J. (2004). Visual agnosia. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-56203-0. OCLC 474679492. 
  15. ^ Barton, Jason J.S.; Cherkasova, Mariya v.; Press, Daniel Z.; Intriligator, James M.; O'Connor, Margaret (2004). "Perception functions in Prosopagnosia". Perception (United Kingdom: Pion) 33 (8): 939–56. PMID 15521693. doi:10.1068/p5243. 
  16. ^ Grueter, M.; Grueter, T., Bell, V., Horst, J., Laskowski. W., Sperlings. K., Halligan, P.W., Ellis, H.D., & Kennerknecht, I (2007). "Hereditary Prosopagnosia: The First Case Series" (PDF). Cortex 43 (6): 734–749. PMID 17710825. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70502-1. 
  17. ^ Kennerknecht, I.; Grueter, T.; Welling, B.; Wentzek, S.; Horst, J. R.; Edwards, S.; Grueter, M. (August 2006). "First report of prevalence of non-syndromic hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA)" (PDF). American Journal of Medical Genetics 140A (15): 1617–1622. PMID 16817175. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31343. 
  18. ^ Russell, Richard; Chatterjee, Garga, Nakayama, Ken (January 2012). "Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: No special role for surface reflectance processing". Neuropsychologia 50 (2): 334–340. PMID 22192636. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.004. 
  19. ^ Bauer RM (1984). "Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: a neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test". Neuropsychologia 22 (4): 457–69. PMID 6483172. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(84)90040-X. 
  20. ^ Nancy L. Mindick (2010). Understanding Facial Recognition Difficulties in Children: Prosopagnosia Management Strategies for Parents and Professionals (JKP Essentials). Jessica Kingsley Pub. ISBN 1-84905-802-4. OCLC 610833680. 
  21. ^ Schmalzl L, Palermo R, Green M, Brunsdon R, Coltheart M (July 2008). "Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia". Cogn Neuropsychol 25 (5): 704–29. PMID 18720102. doi:10.1080/02643290802299350. 
  22. ^ Wilson, C. Ellie; Palermo, Romina, Schmalzl, Laura and Brock, Jon (February 2010). "Specificity of impaired facial identity recognition in children with suspected developmental prosopagnosia". Cognitive Neuropsychology 27 (1): 30–45. PMID 20623389. doi:10.1080/02643294.2010.490207. 
  23. ^ a b Duchaine B, Nakayama K (2006). "The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants". Neuropsychologia 44 (4): 576–85. PMID 16169565. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001. 
  24. ^ Duncan Bannatyne. "I am a mild sufferer of Prosopagnosia". Twitter. 
  25. ^ a b Grüter T, Grüter M (2007). "Prosopagnosia in biographies and autobiographies". Perception 36 (2): 299–301. PMID 17402670. doi:10.1068/p5716. 
  26. ^ WNYC: Radiolab – Strangers in the Mirror
  27. ^ Farmelo, G. The Strangest Man. Faber & Faber, London 2009. 
  28. ^
  29. ^ "Jane Goodall Interview – page 5 / 9 – Academy of Achievement". 2009-08-20. Retrieved 2010-02-20. 
  30. ^ Goodall J, Berman P (2000). Reason for Hope. London: Thorsons. pp. XIII–XIV. ISBN 0-7225-4042-6. 
  31. ^ "Guinea-pig geeks get their revenge". The Age (Melbourne). January 10, 2008. 
  32. ^ "Thierry Lhermitte, le cobaye de l'hôpital" (in French). Retrieved 2010-06-16. 
  33. ^ Markos Moulitsas, "Midday open thread," January 28, 2010 at 12:05:56 PM PST, at Daily Kos
  34. ^ Tom Junod (May 20, 2013). "Brad Pitt: A Life So Large". Esquire. Retrieved April 14, 2015. 
  35. ^ Oliver Sacks (August 30, 2010). "Face-Blind: Why are some of us terrible at recognizing faces?". The New Yorker. p. 36. 
  36. ^ "Everyone looks the same to me". 2007-11-09. Retrieved 2010-02-20. 
  37. ^ "Imagine if you couldn't recognise a single face. Not your husband's, your child's ‒ or your own: Two women with the condition explain that it's more common than you think". 19 September 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2014. 
  38. ^ "Princess Victoria's face confession". 13 February 2008. Retrieved 31 December 2014. 

Further reading

External links