Adverts

Open Access Articles- Top Results for Rocketdyne F-1

Rocketdyne F-1

F-1
300px
F-1 rocket engine specifically sayshfhri
Country of origin United States
Manufacturer Rocketdyne
Liquid-fuel engine
Propellant LOX / RP-1
Cycle Gas-generator
Performance
Thrust (SL) Script error: No such module "convert".
Chamber pressure Script error: No such module "convert".
Isp (SL) Script error: No such module "convert".

The F-1 is a gas-generator cycle rocket engine developed in the United States by Rocketdyne in the late 1950s and used in the Saturn V rocket in the 1960s and early 1970s. Five F-1 engines were used in the S-IC first stage of each Saturn V, which served as the main launch vehicle of the Apollo program. The F-1 remains the most powerful single-combustion chamber liquid-fueled rocket engine ever developed.[1]

History

File:S-IC engines and Von Braun.jpg
Wernher von Braun with the F-1 engines of the Saturn V first stage at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center

The F-1 was originally developed by Rocketdyne to meet a 1955 U.S. Air Force requirement for a very large rocket engine. The eventual result of that requirement was two engines, the E-1 and the much larger F-1. The E-1, although successfully tested in static firing, was quickly seen as a technological dead-end, and was abandoned for the larger, more powerful F-1. The Air Force eventually halted development of the F-1 because of a lack of requirement for such a large engine. However, the recently created National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) appreciated the usefulness of an engine with so much power, and contracted Rocketdyne to complete its development. Test firings of F-1 components had been performed as early as 1957. The first static firing of a full-stage developmental F-1 was performed in March 1959. The first F-1 was delivered to NASA MSFC in October 1963. In December 1964, the F-1 completed flight-rating tests. Testing continued at least through 1965.[2]

Early development tests revealed serious combustion instability problems which sometimes caused catastrophic failure.[3] Initially, progress on this problem was slow, as it was intermittent and unpredictable. Oscillations of 4 kHz with harmonics to 24 kHz were observed. Eventually, engineers developed a diagnostic technique of detonating small explosive charges (which they called "bombs") outside the combustion chamber, through a tangential tube (RDX, C4 or black powder were used) while the engine was firing. This allowed them to determine exactly how the running chamber responded to variations in pressure, and to determine how to nullify these oscillations. The designers could then quickly experiment with different co-axial fuel-injector designs to obtain the one most resistant to instability. These problems were addressed from 1959 through 1961. Eventually, engine combustion was so stable, it would self-damp artificially induced instability within 1/10 of a second.

Design

File:SaturnF1EngineDiagram.png
F-1 rocket engine components

The Rocketdyne-developed F-1 engine is the most powerful single-nozzle liquid-fueled rocket engine ever flown. The RD-170 produces 11% more and the RD-171 produces 20% greater thrust using a cluster of four combustion chambers and four nozzles. The M-1 rocket engine was designed to have more thrust, however it was only tested at the component level. The F-1 was a liquid-fueled rocket motor, burning RP-1 (kerosene) as fuel, and using liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidizer. A turbopump was used to inject fuel and oxygen into the combustion chamber.

The heart of the engine was the thrust chamber, which mixed and burned the fuel and oxidizer to produce thrust. A domed chamber at the top of the engine served as a manifold supplying liquid oxygen to the injectors, and also served as a mount for the gimbal bearing which transmitted the thrust to the body of the rocket. Below this dome were the injectors, which directed fuel and oxidizer into the thrust chamber in a way designed to promote mixing and combustion. Fuel was supplied to the injectors from a separate manifold; some of the fuel first travelled in 178 tubes down the length of the thrust chamber—which formed approximately the upper half of the exhaust nozzle—and back, to cool the nozzle.

A gas-generator was used to drive a turbine which in turn drove separate fuel and oxygen pumps, each feeding the thrust chamber assembly. The turbine was driven at 5,500 RPM by the gas generator, producing Script error: No such module "convert".. The fuel pump produced Script error: No such module "convert". of RP-1 per minute while the oxidizer pump delivered Script error: No such module "convert". of liquid oxygen per minute. Environmentally, the turbopump was required to withstand temperatures ranging from input gas at Script error: No such module "convert". to liquid oxygen at Script error: No such module "convert".. Structurally, fuel was used to lubricate and cool the turbine bearings.

File:F-1 Engines Being Installed.jpg
Installation of F-1 engines to the Saturn V S-IC Stage. The nozzle extension is absent from the engine being fitted.

Below the thrust chamber was the nozzle extension, roughly half the length of the engine. This extension increased the expansion ratio of the engine from 10:1 to 16:1. The exhaust from the turbopump was fed into the nozzle extension by a large, tapered manifold; this relatively cool gas formed a film which protected the nozzle extension from the hot (Script error: No such module "convert".) exhaust gas.[4]

Each second, a single F-1 burned Script error: No such module "convert". of oxidizer and fuel: Script error: No such module "convert". of liquid oxygen and Script error: No such module "convert". of RP-1, generating Script error: No such module "convert". of thrust. This equated to a flow rate of Script error: No such module "convert". per second; Script error: No such module "convert". of LOX and Script error: No such module "convert". of RP-1. During their two and a half minutes of operation, the five F-1s propelled the Saturn V vehicle to a height of Script error: No such module "convert". and a speed of Script error: No such module "convert".. The combined flow rate of the five F-1s in the Saturn V was Script error: No such module "convert". per second,[4] or Script error: No such module "convert".. Each F-1 engine had more thrust than three Space Shuttle Main Engines combined.[5]

Designer of the pump for the E-1/F-1 for Rocketdyne was Ernest A. Lamont. His hand-written original calculations are part of the family archives and available for display. He stated that the design of the rocket engine hinged on the question of whether the pump design was viable.[citation needed]

Pre and post ignition procedures

During static test firing, the kerosene-based RP-1 fuel left hydrocarbon deposits and vapors in the engine post test firing. These had to be removed from the engine to avoid problems during engine handling and future firing, and the solvent trichloroethylene (TCE) was used to clean the engine's fuel system immediately before and after each test firing. The cleaning procedure involved pumping TCE through the engine's fuel system and letting the solvent overflow for a period ranging from several seconds to 30–35 minutes, depending upon the engine and the severity of the deposits. For some engines, the engine's gas generator and LOX dome were also flushed with TCE prior to test firing.[6][7] The F-1 rocket engine had its LOX dome, gas generator, and thrust chamber fuel jacket flushed with TCE during launch preparations.[7]

Specifications

Apollo 4, 6, and 8 Apollo 9–17
Thrust (sea level): Script error: No such module "convert". Script error: No such module "convert".
Burn time: 150 seconds 165 seconds
Specific impulse: Script error: No such module "convert". Script error: No such module "convert".
Chamber pressure: Script error: No such module "convert". Script error: No such module "convert".
Engine weight dry: Script error: No such module "convert". Script error: No such module "convert".
Engine weight burnout: Script error: No such module "convert". Script error: No such module "convert".
Height: Script error: No such module "convert".
Diameter: Script error: No such module "convert".
Exit to throat ratio: 16 to 1
Propellants: LOX & RP-1
Mixture mass ratio: 2.27:1 oxidizer to fuel
Contractor: NAA/Rocketdyne
Vehicle application: Saturn V / S-IC 1st stage - 5-engines

Sources:[4][8]

F-1 improvements

F-1 thrust and efficiency were improved between Apollo 8 (SA-503) and Apollo 17 (SA-512), which was necessary to meet the increasing payload capacity demands of later Apollo missions. There were small performance variations between engines on a given mission, and variations in average thrust between missions. For Apollo 15, F-1 performance was:

  • Thrust (average, per engine, sea level liftoff): Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Burn time: 159 seconds
  • Specific impulse: Script error: No such module "convert".
  • Mixture ratio: 2.2674
  • S-IC total sea level liftoff thrust: Script error: No such module "convert".

Measuring and making comparisons of rocket engine thrust is more complicated than it first appears. Based on actual measurement the liftoff thrust of Apollo 15 was Script error: No such module "convert"., which equates to an average F-1 thrust of Script error: No such module "convert". – significantly more than the specified value.

F-1A after Apollo

See also: Saturn MLV

During the 1960s, Rocketdyne undertook uprating development of the F-1 resulting in the new engine specification F-1A. While outwardly very similar to the F-1, the F-1A produced a larger thrust of about Script error: No such module "convert". in tests,[9] and would have been used on future Saturn V vehicles in the post-Apollo era. However, the Saturn V production line was closed prior to the end of Project Apollo and no F-1A engine flew on a launch vehicle.[10]

There were proposals to use eight F-1 engines on the first stage of the Nova rocket. Numerous proposals have been made from the 1970s on to develop new expendable boosters based around the F-1 engine design. These include the Saturn-Shuttle, and one in 2013.[10] As of 2013, none has proceeded beyond the initial study phase.

The F-1 is the largest, highest thrust single-chamber, single-nozzle liquid fuel engine flown. The RD-170 and RD-171 from the Soviet Union use a cluster of four separate combustion chambers and nozzles, giving the appearance of four engines; however, the combustion chambers are all driven by a single turbopump. The assembly produces around 20% more thrust than the F-1, the highest thrust liquid-fuel engines ever flown. Larger solid-fuel engines exist, such as the Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster with a sea-level liftoff thrust of Script error: No such module "convert". apiece.

F-1B booster

As part of the Space Launch System (SLS) program, NASA is running the Advanced Booster Competition, scheduled to end with the selection of a winning booster configuration in 2015. In 2012, PWR proposed using a derivative of the F-1 engine in the competition.[11][12] In 2013, engineers at the Marshall Space Flight Center began tests with an original F-1, serial number F-6049, which was removed from Apollo 11 due to a glitch. The engine was never used, and for many years it was at the Smithsonian Institution. The tests are designed to refamiliarize NASA with the design and propellants of the F-1 in anticipation of using an evolved version of the engine in future deep space flight applications.[13]

Pratt and Whitney, Rocketdyne, and Dynetics, Inc. presented a competitor to the five-segment Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster and NK-33 engines intended for the Space Launch System, using two increased-thrust and heavily modified F-1B engines. Due to the engine's potential advantage in specific impulse (a unit analogous to car fuel efficiency), if this F-1B configuration were integrated with the SLS Block II, the vehicle could deliver 150 metric tons to low earth orbit, 20 metric tons greater than what is achievable with the currently planned solid boosters.[14]

The F-1B engine has a design goal to be at least as powerful as the un-flight-tested F-1A, while also being more cost effective. The design incorporates a greatly simplified combustion chamber, a reduced number of engine parts, and the removal of the F-1 exhaust recycling system, including the turbopump exhaust mid-nozzle and the "curtain" cooling manifold. The reduction in parts costs is aided by using selective laser melting in the 3-D printing of metallic parts.[11][15] The resulting F-1B engine is intended to produce Script error: No such module "convert". of thrust at sea level, a 15% increase over the approximate Script error: No such module "convert". of thrust that the mature Apollo 15 F-1 engines produced.[11]

Locations of F-1 engines

Sixty-five F-1 engines were launched aboard thirteen Saturn Vs, and each first stage landed in the Atlantic Ocean after about two and a half minutes of flight. Ten of these followed approximately the same flight azimuth of 72 degrees, but Apollo 15 and Apollo 17 followed significantly more southerly azimuths (80.088 degrees and 91.503 degrees, respectively). The Skylab launch vehicle flew at a more northerly azimuth to reach a higher inclination orbit (50 degrees versus the usual 32.5 degrees).[16]

Ten F-1 engines were installed on two Saturn Vs that never flew. The first stage from SA-514 is on display at the Johnson Space Center in Houston and the first stage from SA-515 is on display at the Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans.

A test engine is on display at the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney, Australia. It was the 25th out of 114 research and development engines built by Rocketdyne and it was fired 35 times. The engine is on loan to the museum from the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum. It is the only F-1 on display outside the United States.[17]

Recovery

On March 28, 2012, a team funded by Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com, reported that they had located the F-1 rocket engines from an Apollo mission using sonar equipment.[18] Bezos stated he planned to raise at least one of the engines, which rest at a depth of Script error: No such module "convert"., about Script error: No such module "convert". east of Cape Canaveral, Florida; however, the condition of the engines, which have been submerged for more than 40 years, was unknown.[19] NASA Administrator Charles Bolden released a statement congratulating Bezos and his team for their find and wished them success. He also affirmed NASA's position that any recovered artifacts would remain property of the agency, but that they would likely be offered to the Smithsonian Institution and other museums, depending on the number recovered.[20]

On March 20, 2013, Bezos announced he had succeeded in bringing parts of an F-1 engine to the surface, and released photographs. Bezos noted, "Many of the original serial numbers are missing or partially missing, which is going to make mission identification difficult. We might see more during restoration."[21] The recovery ship was Seaboard Worker, and had on board a team of specialists organized by Bezos for the recovery effort.[22] On July 19, 2013, Bezos revealed that the serial number of one of the recovered engine is Rocketdyne serial number 2044 (equating to NASA number 6044), the #5 (center) engine that helped Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins to reach the Moon with the Apollo 11 mission.[23] The recovered parts are at the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center in Hutchinson for the process of conservation.[23][22]

In August 2014, it was revealed that parts of two different F-1 engines were recovered, one from Apollo 11 and one from another Apollo flight, while a photograph of a cleaned-up engine was released. Bezos plans to put the engines on display at various places, including the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, DC.[22]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ W. David Woods, How Apollo Flew to the Moon, Springer, 2008, ISBN 978-0-387-71675-6, p. 19
  2. ^ "NASA Rocketdyne document" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-12-27. 
  3. ^ Ellison, Renea; Moser, Marlow, Combustion Instability Analysis and the Effects of Drop Size on Acoustic Driving Rocket Flow (PDF), Huntsville, Alabama: Propulsion Research Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville 
  4. ^ a b c Saturn V News Reference: F-1 Engine Fact Sheet (PDF), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, December 1968, pp. 3–3, 3–4, retrieved 2008-06-01 
  5. ^ NSTS 1988 News Reference Manual, NASA, retrieved 2008-07-03 
  6. ^ "The Use of Trichloroethylene at NASA’s SSFL Sites" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-12-27. 
  7. ^ a b "F-1 Rocket Engine Operating Instructions". Ntrs.nasa.gov. 2013-03-01. Retrieved 2013-12-27. 
  8. ^ F-1 Engine (chart), NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, MSFC-9801771, retrieved 2008-06-01 
  9. ^ "Evacuation order lifted near derailed Alberta propane cars". Airingnews.com. Retrieved 2013-12-27. 
  10. ^ a b Hutchinson, Lee (2013-04-14). "New F-1B rocket engine upgrades Apollo-era design with 1.8M lbs of thrust". ARS technica. Retrieved 2013-04-15. 
  11. ^ a b c Lee Hutchinson (2013-04-15). "New F-1B rocket engine upgrades Apollo-era design with 1.8M lbs of thrust". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2013-04-15. 
  12. ^ "Rocket companies hope to repurpose Saturn 5 engines". 
  13. ^ Jay Reeves (2013-01-24). "NASA testing vintage engine from Apollo 11 rocket". Associated Press. Retrieved 2013-01-24. 
  14. ^ Chris Bergin (2012-11-09). "Dynetics and PWR aiming to liquidize SLS booster competition with F-1 power". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 2013-12-27. 
  15. ^ "Dynetics reporting "outstanding" progress on F-1B rocket engine.". Ars Technica. 2013-08-13. Retrieved 2013-08-13. 
  16. ^ Orloff, Richard (September 2004). NASA, Apollo By the Numbers, "Earth Orbit Data"
  17. ^ Doherty, Kerry (November 2009). Powerhouse Museum "Inside the Collection"
  18. ^ Kluger, Jeffrey (April 29, 2012). "Has Bezos Really Found the Apollo 11 Engines?". Time.com. Archived from the original on May 3, 2012. 
  19. ^ Clark, Stephen (April 29, 2012). "NASA sees no problem recovering Apollo engines". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 3, 2012. 
  20. ^ Weaver, David (April 30, 2012). "NASA Administrator Supports Apollo Engine Recovery". NASA.gov. Release 12-102. Archived from the original on May 3, 2012. 
  21. ^ Walker, Brian (March 20, 2013). "Apollo Mission Rocket Engines Recovered", CNN Light Years blog
  22. ^ a b c Clash, Jim (2014-08-01). "Billionaire Jeff Bezos Talks About His Secret Passion: Space Travel". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2014-08-08. Retrieved 2014-08-03. 
  23. ^ a b Updates: 19 July 2013, Bezos Expeditions, 19 July 2013, accessed 21 July 2013.
Bibliography

External links